1998AnaesthesiaOpen access

A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects and reversibility of cisatracurium and atracurium

M T Carroll, R. K. Mirakhur, D Lowry, Polly Glover, C. J. Kerr

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

The neuromuscular blocking effects and the reversibility of cisatracurium 0.1 or 0.15 mg.kg-1 were compared with those of atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 during anaesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four stimulation while recording the mechanomyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The block was either allowed to recover spontaneously or was antagonised with neostigmine 50 micrograms.kg-1 at 10% or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four. The median times to maximum block were 2.7, 2.2 and 1.5 min following cisatracurium 0.1 and 0.15 mg.kg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1, respectively. After cisatracurium 0.1 mg.kg-1 had been given, the median time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.8 ('adequate recovery') was 74 min during spontaneous recovery, 48 min after reversal with neostigmine when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 10% of control and 50 min after reversal when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 25% of control. These times for cisatracurium 0.15 mg.kg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 were 90, 66 and 57 min and 75, 56 and 54 min, respectively. Administration of neostigmine significantly shortened the time to adequate recovery for both drugs but there were no significant differences in the case of either neuromuscular blocking drug between the groups of patients given neostigmine at 10 or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The neuromuscular blocking effects and the reversibility of cisatracurium 0.1 or 0.15 mg.kg-1 were compared with those of atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 during anaesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four stimulation while recording the mechanomyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The block was either allowed to recover spontaneously or was antagonised with neostigmine 50 micrograms.kg-1 at 10% or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four. The median times to maximum block were 2.7, 2.2 and 1.5 min following cisatracurium 0.1 and 0.15 mg.kg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1, respectively. After cisatracurium 0.1 mg.kg-1 had been given, the median time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.8 ('adequate recovery') was 74 min during spontaneous recovery, 48 min after reversal with neostigmine when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 10% of control and 50 min after reversal when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 25% of control. These times for cisatracurium 0.15 mg.kg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 were 90, 66 and 57 min and 75, 56 and 54 min, respectively. Administration of neostigmine significantly shortened the time to adequate recovery for both drugs but there were no significant differences in the case of either neuromuscular blocking drug between the groups of patients given neostigmine at 10 or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The neuromuscular blocking effects and the reversibility of cisatracurium 0.1 or 0.15 mg.kg-1 were compared with those of atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 during anaesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four stimulation while recording the mechanomyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The block was either allowed to recover spontaneously or was antagonised with neostigmine 50 micrograms.kg-1 at 10% or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four. The median times to maximum block were 2.7, 2.2 and 1.5 min following cisatracurium 0.1 and 0.15 mg.kg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1, respectively. After cisatracurium 0.1 mg.kg-1 had been given, the median time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.8 ('adequate recovery') was 74 min during spontaneous recovery, 48 min after reversal with neostigmine when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 10% of control and 50 min after reversal when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 25% of control. These times for cisatracurium 0.15 mg.kg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 were 90, 66 and 57 min and 75, 56 and 54 min, respectively. Administration of neostigmine significantly shortened the time to adequate recovery for both drugs but there were no significant differences in the case of either neuromuscular blocking drug between the groups of patients given neostigmine at 10 or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four.

Key concepts: Medicine, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Blocking (statistics), Anesthesia, Neuromuscular monitoring, Atracurium besilate, Vecuronium bromide, Blocking effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects and reversibility of cisatracurium and atracurium — Research Paper | ScholarLens