1975The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Comparison of community noise exposure parameters

W. K. Connor

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

As an initial effort in the development of a city noise control program, noise exposure was determined for 31 sites variously affected by noise from traffic, boats, trains, aircraft, and other sources. Digital monitoring equipment with a 100-dB dynamic range was used to obtain sound-level data for a minimum of 24 hours at each site, with a sampling rate of once per second. Data were reduced in terms of Leq, Ldn, CNEL, and sound-level percentile values. The correlations among these parameters show a dependency on types of noise present and also have implications for selection of limiting values.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As an initial effort in the development of a city noise control program, noise exposure was determined for 31 sites variously affected by noise from traffic, boats, trains, aircraft, and other sources. Digital monitoring equipment with a 100-dB dynamic range was used to obtain sound-level data for a minimum of 24 hours at each site, with a sampling rate of once per second. Data were reduced in terms of Leq, Ldn, CNEL, and sound-level percentile values. The correlations among these parameters show a dependency on types of noise present and also have implications for selection of limiting values.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As an initial effort in the development of a city noise control program, noise exposure was determined for 31 sites variously affected by noise from traffic, boats, trains, aircraft, and other sources. Digital monitoring equipment with a 100-dB dynamic range was used to obtain sound-level data for a minimum of 24 hours at each site, with a sampling rate of once per second. Data were reduced in terms of Leq, Ldn, CNEL, and sound-level percentile values. The correlations among these parameters show a dependency on types of noise present and also have implications for selection of limiting values.

Key concepts: Noise (video), Percentile, Limiting, Acoustics, Range (aeronautics), Environmental science, Sampling (signal processing), Noise control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of community noise exposure parameters — Research Paper | ScholarLens