1997Journal of Cardiovascular ElectrophysiologyRequires access

Nonsustained Reentry Following Successive Stimulation of Cardiac Tissue Through a Unipolar Electrode

Bradley J. Roth

Open publisher page 76 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Using numerical simulations, we predict that nonsustained reentry occurs following a strong, premature stimulus through a unipolar electrode. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our simulations were based on the bidomain model of cardiac tissue, and the active membrane properties were represented by the Beeler-Reuter model. An outwardly propagating wavefront was excited by an initial stimulus (S1). A second stimulus (S2) was then applied through the same electrode. Nonsustained reentry or reentrant-like behavior followed the S2 stimulus for both cathodal and anodal stimulation, and were associated with "break" stimulation but not with "make" stimulation. The direction of spiral-wave rotation was reversed when the polarity of the stimulus was reversed. These complex dynamics occur only for a narrow window of S1-S2 intervals. During anodal S2 stimulation, two different modes of reentry exist. Our simulations also explain the "no response" phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Our mathematical model predicts that both anodal and cathodal unipolar S2 stimulation results in reentry. This behavior arises from an interaction of virtual anodes and cathodes surrounding the stimulating electrode.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Using numerical simulations, we predict that nonsustained reentry occurs following a strong, premature stimulus through a unipolar electrode. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our simulations were based on the bidomain model of cardiac tissue, and the active membrane properties were represented by the Beeler-Reuter model. An outwardly propagating wavefront was excited by an initial stimulus (S1). A second stimulus (S2) was then applied through the same electrode. Nonsustained reentry or reentrant-like behavior followed the S2 stimulus for both cathodal and anodal stimulation, and were associated with "break" stimulation but not with "make" stimulation. The direction of spiral-wave rotation was reversed when the polarity of the stimulus was reversed. These complex dynamics occur only for a narrow window of S1-S2 intervals. During anodal S2 stimulation, two different modes of reentry exist. Our simulations also explain the "no response" phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Our mathematical model predicts that both anodal and cathodal unipolar S2 stimulation results in reentry. This behavior arises from an interaction of virtual anodes and cathodes surrounding the stimulating electrode.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 76 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Using numerical simulations, we predict that nonsustained reentry occurs following a strong, premature stimulus through a unipolar electrode. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our simulations were based on the bidomain model of cardiac tissue, and the active membrane properties were represented by the Beeler-Reuter model. An outwardly propagating wavefront was excited by an initial stimulus (S1). A second stimulus (S2) was then applied through the same electrode. Nonsustained reentry or reentrant-like behavior followed the S2 stimulus for both cathodal and anodal stimulation, and were associated with "break" stimulation but not with "make" stimulation. The direction of spiral-wave rotation was reversed when the polarity of the stimulus was reversed. These complex dynamics occur only for a narrow window of S1-S2 intervals. During anodal S2 stimulation, two different modes of reentry exist. Our simulations also explain the "no response" phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Our mathematical model predicts that both anodal and cathodal unipolar S2 stimulation results in reentry. This behavior arises from an interaction of virtual anodes and cathodes surrounding the stimulating electrode.

Key concepts: Reentry, Medicine, Cardiology, Stimulation, Internal medicine, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nonsustained Reentry Following Successive Stimulation of Cardiac Tissue Through a Unipolar Electrode — Research Paper | ScholarLens