1984Journal of Hydraulic EngineeringRequires access

Parameter Optimization in Flood Routing

Peter R. Wormleaton, M. Karmegam

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The writers demonstrate how the geometric and hydraulic properties of river reaches, which are required in flood routing when using the Saint‐Venant equations, may be identified using optimization methods. It is suggested that these optimization methods may prove an attractive alternative to the costly and time‐consuming survey work or uncertainty, or both, that often accompany the estimation of numerical river model parameters. The writers adopt the four‐point finite difference scheme of Amein and Fang (2) to solve the Saint‐Venant equations. They report on an investigation into the selection of time and space increments in order to limit the finite‐difference error in the solution. The optimization process involves minimizing the errors in depth and discharge of the downstream routed hydrograph. Two objective function criteria are compared, namely minimax and least‐squares. Four optimization parameters are used, two representing channel geometry and two its hydraulic properties. Five flood events are optimized and generally the two optimization methods give consistent results, although there are differences between winter and spring floods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The writers demonstrate how the geometric and hydraulic properties of river reaches, which are required in flood routing when using the Saint‐Venant equations, may be identified using optimization methods. It is suggested that these optimization methods may prove an attractive alternative to the costly and time‐consuming survey work or uncertainty, or both, that often accompany the estimation of numerical river model parameters. The writers adopt the four‐point finite difference scheme of Amein and Fang (2) to solve the Saint‐Venant equations. They report on an investigation into the selection of time and space increments in order to limit the finite‐difference error in the solution. The optimization process involves minimizing the errors in depth and discharge of the downstream routed hydrograph. Two objective function criteria are compared, namely minimax and least‐squares. Four optimization parameters are used, two representing channel geometry and two its hydraulic properties. Five flood events are optimized and generally the two optimization methods give consistent results, although there are differences between winter and spring floods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The writers demonstrate how the geometric and hydraulic properties of river reaches, which are required in flood routing when using the Saint‐Venant equations, may be identified using optimization methods. It is suggested that these optimization methods may prove an attractive alternative to the costly and time‐consuming survey work or uncertainty, or both, that often accompany the estimation of numerical river model parameters. The writers adopt the four‐point finite difference scheme of Amein and Fang (2) to solve the Saint‐Venant equations. They report on an investigation into the selection of time and space increments in order to limit the finite‐difference error in the solution. The optimization process involves minimizing the errors in depth and discharge of the downstream routed hydrograph. Two objective function criteria are compared, namely minimax and least‐squares. Four optimization parameters are used, two representing channel geometry and two its hydraulic properties. Five flood events are optimized and generally the two optimization methods give consistent results, although there are differences between winter and spring floods.

Key concepts: Mathematical optimization, Hydrograph, Routing (electronic design automation), Channel (broadcasting), Optimization problem, Flood myth, Applied mathematics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Parameter Optimization in Flood Routing — Research Paper | ScholarLens