2009ChemotherapyRequires access

Comparative Study of Ceftriaxone Monotherapy versus a Combination Regimen of Cefuroxime plus Gentamicin for Treatment of Serious Bacterial Infections: The Efficacy, Safety and Effect on Fecal Flora

Ilja M. Hoepelman, M. Rozenberg-Arska, J. Verhoef

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of once daily monotherapy relative to standard combination antibiotic therapy for the initial management of patients suspected of serious bacterial infections, we conducted a randomized trial comparing ceftriaxone (Rocephin) with a combination of cefuroxime plus gentamicin. Of 105 patients, 53 were treated with ceftriaxone alone and 52 with the combination; 13 patients were considered not evaluable. 42 of 53 patients given ceftriaxone and 33 of 52 given cefuroxime plus gentamicin responded to treatment (p = 0.07). Three patients given ceftriaxone and 6 who received gentamicin plus cefuroxime died (p = 0.28). Definite bacterial infections were identified in 67 patients; of the evaluable patients with a definite infection 27 of 29 who received ceftriaxone and 21 of 31 who were treated with the combination were cured (p = 0.01). No difference was found in the number of side effects. However, therapy had to be discontinued due to treatment failure, an adverse effect or death in 1 of 33 patients given ceftriaxone and in 11 of 34 given the combination (p = 0.002). Ceftriaxone was found to have an impact on the count of E. coli in intestinal microflora. Changes in normal bacterial composition did not lead to the overgrowth with resistant Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas, however, colonization by yeast was observed. Using ceftriaxone reduced the cost of antimicrobial therapy per patient by 107 pounds (US$ 183). Moreover, the total time save per patient due to decreased nursing and drug administration time per day was 40 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To assess the efficacy of once daily monotherapy relative to standard combination antibiotic therapy for the initial management of patients suspected of serious bacterial infections, we conducted a randomized trial comparing ceftriaxone (Rocephin) with a combination of cefuroxime plus gentamicin. Of 105 patients, 53 were treated with ceftriaxone alone and 52 with the combination; 13 patients were considered not evaluable. 42 of 53 patients given ceftriaxone and 33 of 52 given cefuroxime plus gentamicin responded to treatment (p = 0.07). Three patients given ceftriaxone and 6 who received gentamicin plus cefuroxime died (p = 0.28). Definite bacterial infections were identified in 67 patients; of the evaluable patients with a definite infection 27 of 29 who received ceftriaxone and 21 of 31 who were treated with the combination were cured (p = 0.01). No difference was found in the number of side effects. However, therapy had to be discontinued due to treatment failure, an adverse effect or death in 1 of 33 patients given ceftriaxone and in 11 of 34 given the combination (p = 0.002). Ceftriaxone was found to have an impact on the count of E. coli in intestinal microflora. Changes in normal bacterial composition did not lead to the overgrowth with resistant Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas, however, colonization by yeast was observed. Using ceftriaxone reduced the cost of antimicrobial therapy per patient by 107 pounds (US$ 183). Moreover, the total time save per patient due to decreased nursing and drug administration time per day was 40 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To assess the efficacy of once daily monotherapy relative to standard combination antibiotic therapy for the initial management of patients suspected of serious bacterial infections, we conducted a randomized trial comparing ceftriaxone (Rocephin) with a combination of cefuroxime plus gentamicin. Of 105 patients, 53 were treated with ceftriaxone alone and 52 with the combination; 13 patients were considered not evaluable. 42 of 53 patients given ceftriaxone and 33 of 52 given cefuroxime plus gentamicin responded to treatment (p = 0.07). Three patients given ceftriaxone and 6 who received gentamicin plus cefuroxime died (p = 0.28). Definite bacterial infections were identified in 67 patients; of the evaluable patients with a definite infection 27 of 29 who received ceftriaxone and 21 of 31 who were treated with the combination were cured (p = 0.01). No difference was found in the number of side effects. However, therapy had to be discontinued due to treatment failure, an adverse effect or death in 1 of 33 patients given ceftriaxone and in 11 of 34 given the combination (p = 0.002). Ceftriaxone was found to have an impact on the count of E. coli in intestinal microflora. Changes in normal bacterial composition did not lead to the overgrowth with resistant Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas, however, colonization by yeast was observed. Using ceftriaxone reduced the cost of antimicrobial therapy per patient by 107 pounds (US$ 183). Moreover, the total time save per patient due to decreased nursing and drug administration time per day was 40 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Key concepts: Ceftriaxone, Cefuroxime, Medicine, Gentamicin, Cephalosporin, Internal medicine, Regimen, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study of Ceftriaxone Monotherapy versus a Combination Regimen of Cefuroxime plus Gentamicin for Treatment of Serious Bacterial Infections: The Efficacy, Safety and Effect on Fecal Flora — Research Paper | ScholarLens