Estimation of Rupture Speed for the 1995 ML4.1 Shacheng, Hebei, China, Earthquake Sequence Based on the Minimum Radiation Energy Criterion
Boyan Liu, Baoping Shi
Abstract
Boyan Liu, Baoping Shi
Abstract
Abstract From variational principle, we have derived the minimum radiation energy criterion (MREC), and use it in the earthquake source dynamic study. For the 1995 ML 4.1 Shacheng Heibei earthquake sequence, we come to the conclusion that the dynamic rupture processes of main shock and aftershocks are totally different: the rupture speed of the ML 4.1 main shock is about 0.89 of shear wave speed, closing to the Rayleigh wave speed, while the rupture speeds of the 28 aftershocks range from 0.05 to 0.55 of shear wave speed, which is much smaller than shear wave speed. In addition, based on the circular crack extending model, we also calculated the seismic radiation efficiencies for this earthquake sequence, and the results indicated that, for most aftershocks, the radiation efficiencies are less than 10%, inferring a low seismic efficiency. In our study, we suggest that the dynamic rupture processes of these aftershocks could be related to the crack (sub‐fault) extension inside the main fault, rather than the simple momentum of the moving block, which has been commonly assumed in the fault frictional motion if an overshoot occurs during earthquake rupture. The local stress concentrations inside the fault after main shock may play an important role in sustaining the crack extension. Therefore, the fracturing process associated with the crack extension for the aftershock becomes a main energy dissipation mechanism. Compared with the ML 4.1 main shock, we also find that there exists an essential difference in the earthquake energy partition for the aftershock source dynamics. In other words, the fracture energy dissipation could not be ignored in the source parameter estimation for the earthquake faulting, especially for small earthquakes. Otherwise, the radiated seismic energy could be overestimated or underestimated.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract From variational principle, we have derived the minimum radiation energy criterion (MREC), and use it in the earthquake source dynamic study. For the 1995 ML 4.1 Shacheng Heibei earthquake sequence, we come to the conclusion that the dynamic rupture processes of main shock and aftershocks are totally different: the rupture speed of the ML 4.1 main shock is about 0.89 of shear wave speed, closing to the Rayleigh wave speed, while the rupture speeds of the 28 aftershocks range from 0.05 to 0.55 of shear wave speed, which is much smaller than shear wave speed. In addition, based on the circular crack extending model, we also calculated the seismic radiation efficiencies for this earthquake sequence, and the results indicated that, for most aftershocks, the radiation efficiencies are less than 10%, inferring a low seismic efficiency. In our study, we suggest that the dynamic rupture processes of these aftershocks could be related to the crack (sub‐fault) extension inside the main fault, rather than the simple momentum of the moving block, which has been commonly assumed in the fault frictional motion if an overshoot occurs during earthquake rupture. The local stress concentrations inside the fault after main shock may play an important role in sustaining the crack extension. Therefore, the fracturing process associated with the crack extension for the aftershock becomes a main energy dissipation mechanism. Compared with the ML 4.1 main shock, we also find that there exists an essential difference in the earthquake energy partition for the aftershock source dynamics. In other words, the fracture energy dissipation could not be ignored in the source parameter estimation for the earthquake faulting, especially for small earthquakes. Otherwise, the radiated seismic energy could be overestimated or underestimated.
Key concepts: Aftershock, Seismology, Geology, Earthquake rupture, Shock (circulatory), Fault (geology), Shear (geology), Dissipation