2014Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management SciencesOpen access

A Revised Interpretation of Risk in Project Management

Zoltán Sebestyén, Tamás Tóth

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

Both project management and finance have their own advanced risk concept, but developing a correct and complete integration of them has not been resolved so far. The novelty of the paper is a general framework for risk management in which the goals of a project are approached by the interests of owners rather than by the regular object-oriented ways. The framework resolves the following contradictions. 1) The traditional risk management approach distributes the total risk of a project among risk classes; as a consequence, the fact that only a fraction of the project risks are assumed by the owners is ignored. 2) Traditional project risk management cannot deal with the phenomenon that higher risks are found in the risk categories during the later periods of a project. 3) The positive deviation from the project goals is not interpretable in the traditional approach. In the new framework risk analysis becomes a more effective tool for all the participants of a project.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Both project management and finance have their own advanced risk concept, but developing a correct and complete integration of them has not been resolved so far. The novelty of the paper is a general framework for risk management in which the goals of a project are approached by the interests of owners rather than by the regular object-oriented ways. The framework resolves the following contradictions. 1) The traditional risk management approach distributes the total risk of a project among risk classes; as a consequence, the fact that only a fraction of the project risks are assumed by the owners is ignored. 2) Traditional project risk management cannot deal with the phenomenon that higher risks are found in the risk categories during the later periods of a project. 3) The positive deviation from the project goals is not interpretable in the traditional approach. In the new framework risk analysis becomes a more effective tool for all the participants of a project.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Both project management and finance have their own advanced risk concept, but developing a correct and complete integration of them has not been resolved so far. The novelty of the paper is a general framework for risk management in which the goals of a project are approached by the interests of owners rather than by the regular object-oriented ways. The framework resolves the following contradictions. 1) The traditional risk management approach distributes the total risk of a project among risk classes; as a consequence, the fact that only a fraction of the project risks are assumed by the owners is ignored. 2) Traditional project risk management cannot deal with the phenomenon that higher risks are found in the risk categories during the later periods of a project. 3) The positive deviation from the project goals is not interpretable in the traditional approach. In the new framework risk analysis becomes a more effective tool for all the participants of a project.

Key concepts: Project risk management, Risk management, Risk analysis (engineering), Project management, Interpretation (philosophy), Risk management framework, Novelty, Risk management plan

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Revised Interpretation of Risk in Project Management — Research Paper | ScholarLens