2004Renal FailureOpen access

Comparison of Cystatin C, Creatinine and Creatinine Clearance vs. GFR for Detection of Renal Failure in Renal Transplant Patients

Jean‐Philippe Daniel, François Chantrel, M. Offner, Bruno Moulin, Thierry Hannedouche

Open full text 25 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum cystatin C (Scyst) has been suggested as an alternative index of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and could be useful in renal transplant patients. METHODS: In a 60-subject cohort (40 +/- 12 years old), we compared the simultaneous measurements of Scyst, serum creatinine (Screat), creatinine clearance (Ccreat), Cockcroft and Gault's estimated clearance (Ccg) and GFR measured using inulin clearance (Cin). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using two Cin cut-off (60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). RESULTS: A significant correlation was found among Cin on one hand and 1/Scyst, Ccreat, 1/Screat and Ccg on the other hand. Best fits (sensitivity/specificity) at 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 were 1.18 mg/L (0.72/0.80) for Scyst, 1.32 mg/dL (0.67/0.90) for Screat, 77 mL/min (0.80/0.70) for Ccg and 104 mL/min (0.88/0.80) for Ccreat. The areas under the ROC curves were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides cut-off values for Screat and Ccg for detection of renal failure in renal transplant patients. However, the results also suggest that Scyst is not a more sensitive marker than Screat or Ccg for detecting renal failure in renal transplant patients.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Serum cystatin C (Scyst) has been suggested as an alternative index of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and could be useful in renal transplant patients. METHODS: In a 60-subject cohort (40 +/- 12 years old), we compared the simultaneous measurements of Scyst, serum creatinine (Screat), creatinine clearance (Ccreat), Cockcroft and Gault's estimated clearance (Ccg) and GFR measured using inulin clearance (Cin). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using two Cin cut-off (60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). RESULTS: A significant correlation was found among Cin on one hand and 1/Scyst, Ccreat, 1/Screat and Ccg on the other hand. Best fits (sensitivity/specificity) at 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 were 1.18 mg/L (0.72/0.80) for Scyst, 1.32 mg/dL (0.67/0.90) for Screat, 77 mL/min (0.80/0.70) for Ccg and 104 mL/min (0.88/0.80) for Ccreat. The areas under the ROC curves were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides cut-off values for Screat and Ccg for detection of renal failure in renal transplant patients. However, the results also suggest that Scyst is not a more sensitive marker than Screat or Ccg for detecting renal failure in renal transplant patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum cystatin C (Scyst) has been suggested as an alternative index of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and could be useful in renal transplant patients. METHODS: In a 60-subject cohort (40 +/- 12 years old), we compared the simultaneous measurements of Scyst, serum creatinine (Screat), creatinine clearance (Ccreat), Cockcroft and Gault's estimated clearance (Ccg) and GFR measured using inulin clearance (Cin). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using two Cin cut-off (60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). RESULTS: A significant correlation was found among Cin on one hand and 1/Scyst, Ccreat, 1/Screat and Ccg on the other hand. Best fits (sensitivity/specificity) at 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 were 1.18 mg/L (0.72/0.80) for Scyst, 1.32 mg/dL (0.67/0.90) for Screat, 77 mL/min (0.80/0.70) for Ccg and 104 mL/min (0.88/0.80) for Ccreat. The areas under the ROC curves were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides cut-off values for Screat and Ccg for detection of renal failure in renal transplant patients. However, the results also suggest that Scyst is not a more sensitive marker than Screat or Ccg for detecting renal failure in renal transplant patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Renal function, Urology, Creatinine, Cystatin C, Receiver operating characteristic, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Cystatin C, Creatinine and Creatinine Clearance vs. GFR for Detection of Renal Failure in Renal Transplant Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens