2012Journal of Applied Remote SensingRequires access

Use of a vegetation index model to estimate gross primary production in open grassland

Chaoyang Wu

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

Observations from satellite remote sensing provide important tools for regional and global monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems. This article evaluated a recently developed vegetation index (VI) model that estimates gross primary production (GPP) in an open grassland using flux measurements and 250-m moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) images. Two VIs, the two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), were tested as indicators of both fraction of absorbed photosynthetic active radiation (f APAR) and light use efficiency (LUE). The standard MODIS GPP product was moderately correlated with flux-measured GPP as indicated by the coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.56 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 15.4 gCm−2 8d−1. In comparison, results suggested that the VI model can provide improved estimates of GPP, with R2 of 0.80, 0.82, and 0.81 for EVI2 × EVI2 × photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), NDVI × EVI2 × PAR, and NDVI × NDVI × PAR, respectively. The underlying reason was that both EVI2 and NDVI were potential proxies of f APAR (R2 of 0.43 and 0.53, respectively) and LUE (R2 of 0.52 and 0.46, respectively). The primary analysis will be helpful for spatial improvements of future GPP models.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Observations from satellite remote sensing provide important tools for regional and global monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems. This article evaluated a recently developed vegetation index (VI) model that estimates gross primary production (GPP) in an open grassland using flux measurements and 250-m moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) images. Two VIs, the two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), were tested as indicators of both fraction of absorbed photosynthetic active radiation (f APAR) and light use efficiency (LUE). The standard MODIS GPP product was moderately correlated with flux-measured GPP as indicated by the coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.56 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 15.4 gCm−2 8d−1. In comparison, results suggested that the VI model can provide improved estimates of GPP, with R2 of 0.80, 0.82, and 0.81 for EVI2 × EVI2 × photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), NDVI × EVI2 × PAR, and NDVI × NDVI × PAR, respectively. The underlying reason was that both EVI2 and NDVI were potential proxies of f APAR (R2 of 0.43 and 0.53, respectively) and LUE (R2 of 0.52 and 0.46, respectively). The primary analysis will be helpful for spatial improvements of future GPP models.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Observations from satellite remote sensing provide important tools for regional and global monitoring of terrestrial ecosystems. This article evaluated a recently developed vegetation index (VI) model that estimates gross primary production (GPP) in an open grassland using flux measurements and 250-m moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) images. Two VIs, the two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), were tested as indicators of both fraction of absorbed photosynthetic active radiation (f APAR) and light use efficiency (LUE). The standard MODIS GPP product was moderately correlated with flux-measured GPP as indicated by the coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.56 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 15.4 gCm−2 8d−1. In comparison, results suggested that the VI model can provide improved estimates of GPP, with R2 of 0.80, 0.82, and 0.81 for EVI2 × EVI2 × photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), NDVI × EVI2 × PAR, and NDVI × NDVI × PAR, respectively. The underlying reason was that both EVI2 and NDVI were potential proxies of f APAR (R2 of 0.43 and 0.53, respectively) and LUE (R2 of 0.52 and 0.46, respectively). The primary analysis will be helpful for spatial improvements of future GPP models.

Key concepts: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Enhanced vegetation index, Photosynthetically active radiation, Primary production, Environmental science, Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer, Vegetation (pathology), Grassland

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of a vegetation index model to estimate gross primary production in open grassland — Research Paper | ScholarLens