1990Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer PhysicsRequires access

NMR and dynamic mechanical studies of miscibility enhancement via ionic interactions in polystyrene/poly (ethyl acrylate) blends

Xinsheng Zhang, Adi Eisenberg

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Direct ion‐ion interactions in ionomer blends are achieved through microion elimination by mixing the two ionomers, poly (styrene ‐co‐tetraalkylammonium methacrylate) and poly (ethyl acrylate‐co‐Nmethyl‐4‐vinyl pyridinium. iodide), in a benzene/ methanol mixture. The pyridiniumcarboxylate ionion interactions are compared with pyridinium‐sulfonate interactions which were described before. It is shown that carboxylate ions are much less effective than sulfonate ions in enhancing miscibility in the polystyrene/ poly (ethyl acrylate) system. Complete miscibility is not attained for this polymer pair even with up to 10 mol % ions. In another system, ion pair‐ion pair blends were prepared by mixing poly (styrene‐co‐sodium styrenesulfonate) with poly (ethyl acrylateco‐N‐methyl‐4‐vinyl pyridinium iodide), also in a benzene/ methanol mixture. The results show that ion pair‐ion pair associations are also a much weaker driving force for miscibility enhancement in this polymer pair than the corresponding direct pyridinium‐sulfonate ion‐ion interactions. A ranking is presented of the relative strengths of the various ionic interactions in their effect on miscibility enhancement, which also includes ion‐dipole interactions (sodium sulfonate‐pyridine).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Direct ion‐ion interactions in ionomer blends are achieved through microion elimination by mixing the two ionomers, poly (styrene ‐co‐tetraalkylammonium methacrylate) and poly (ethyl acrylate‐co‐Nmethyl‐4‐vinyl pyridinium. iodide), in a benzene/ methanol mixture. The pyridiniumcarboxylate ionion interactions are compared with pyridinium‐sulfonate interactions which were described before. It is shown that carboxylate ions are much less effective than sulfonate ions in enhancing miscibility in the polystyrene/ poly (ethyl acrylate) system. Complete miscibility is not attained for this polymer pair even with up to 10 mol % ions. In another system, ion pair‐ion pair blends were prepared by mixing poly (styrene‐co‐sodium styrenesulfonate) with poly (ethyl acrylateco‐N‐methyl‐4‐vinyl pyridinium iodide), also in a benzene/ methanol mixture. The results show that ion pair‐ion pair associations are also a much weaker driving force for miscibility enhancement in this polymer pair than the corresponding direct pyridinium‐sulfonate ion‐ion interactions. A ranking is presented of the relative strengths of the various ionic interactions in their effect on miscibility enhancement, which also includes ion‐dipole interactions (sodium sulfonate‐pyridine).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Direct ion‐ion interactions in ionomer blends are achieved through microion elimination by mixing the two ionomers, poly (styrene ‐co‐tetraalkylammonium methacrylate) and poly (ethyl acrylate‐co‐Nmethyl‐4‐vinyl pyridinium. iodide), in a benzene/ methanol mixture. The pyridiniumcarboxylate ionion interactions are compared with pyridinium‐sulfonate interactions which were described before. It is shown that carboxylate ions are much less effective than sulfonate ions in enhancing miscibility in the polystyrene/ poly (ethyl acrylate) system. Complete miscibility is not attained for this polymer pair even with up to 10 mol % ions. In another system, ion pair‐ion pair blends were prepared by mixing poly (styrene‐co‐sodium styrenesulfonate) with poly (ethyl acrylateco‐N‐methyl‐4‐vinyl pyridinium iodide), also in a benzene/ methanol mixture. The results show that ion pair‐ion pair associations are also a much weaker driving force for miscibility enhancement in this polymer pair than the corresponding direct pyridinium‐sulfonate ion‐ion interactions. A ranking is presented of the relative strengths of the various ionic interactions in their effect on miscibility enhancement, which also includes ion‐dipole interactions (sodium sulfonate‐pyridine).

Key concepts: Miscibility, Pyridinium, Counterion, Polymer chemistry, Ionomer, Ethyl acrylate, Polystyrene, Sulfonate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NMR and dynamic mechanical studies of miscibility enhancement via ionic interactions in polystyrene/poly (ethyl acrylate) blends — Research Paper | ScholarLens