1992•Journal of Counseling & DevelopmentRequires access

Predicting the Academic Success of Student‐Athletes Using SAT and Noncognitive Variables

William E. Sedlacek, Javaune Adams‐Gaston

Open publisher page 147 citations

Abstract

Noncognitive variables were better predictors of grades for athletes than were Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores. If is suggested that athletes be considered nontraditional students rather than student‐athletes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Noncognitive variables were better predictors of grades for athletes than were Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores. If is suggested that athletes be considered nontraditional students rather than student‐athletes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 147 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Noncognitive variables were better predictors of grades for athletes than were Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores. If is suggested that athletes be considered nontraditional students rather than student‐athletes.

Key concepts: Athletes, Psychology, Test (biology), Aptitude, Academic achievement, Mathematics education, Developmental psychology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predicting the Academic Success of Student‐Athletes Using SAT and Noncognitive Variables — Research Paper | ScholarLens