1979Journal of the Atmospheric SciencesRequires access

Atmospheric Lapse Rate Regimes and Their Parameterization

Peter H. Stone, John H. Carlson

Open publisher page 219 citations

Abstract

Lapse rates, moist adiabatic lapse rates and the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment are calculated and compared for the mean annual, January and July states in the Northern Hemisphere. In the troposphere above the planetary boundary layer zonal mean lapse rates are within 20% of the moist adiabatic lapse rate from the equator up to about 30°N in January and 50°N in July, but are appreciably more stable in higher latitudes. The latitudinal distribution of tropospheric mean lapse rates clearly delineates two regimes in the atmosphere—a low-latitude regime where the lapse rates are essentially moist adiabatic, and a high-latitude regime where the lapse rates are essentially the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment. The dividing point between the two regimes shifts from 28°N in January to 47°N in July, and the transition is less sharp in July than in January. The absence of appreciable seasonal changes in lapse rates in midlatitudes can be attributed to counterbalancing seasonal changes in the strength of moist convection and baroclinic eddies. Hemispheric mean lapse rates in the mid and lower troposphere are within 0.4 K km−1 of the moist adiabatic lapse rate in July, but are as much as 1.9 K km−1 less in January. Implications for simple climate models are discussed. A principal conclusion is that the vertical temperature structure could be well approximated by a radiative-convective equilibrium model with two critical lapse rates—the moist adiabatic lapse rate and the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Lapse rates, moist adiabatic lapse rates and the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment are calculated and compared for the mean annual, January and July states in the Northern Hemisphere. In the troposphere above the planetary boundary layer zonal mean lapse rates are within 20% of the moist adiabatic lapse rate from the equator up to about 30°N in January and 50°N in July, but are appreciably more stable in higher latitudes. The latitudinal distribution of tropospheric mean lapse rates clearly delineates two regimes in the atmosphere—a low-latitude regime where the lapse rates are essentially moist adiabatic, and a high-latitude regime where the lapse rates are essentially the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment. The dividing point between the two regimes shifts from 28°N in January to 47°N in July, and the transition is less sharp in July than in January. The absence of appreciable seasonal changes in lapse rates in midlatitudes can be attributed to counterbalancing seasonal changes in the strength of moist convection and baroclinic eddies. Hemispheric mean lapse rates in the mid and lower troposphere are within 0.4 K km−1 of the moist adiabatic lapse rate in July, but are as much as 1.9 K km−1 less in January. Implications for simple climate models are discussed. A principal conclusion is that the vertical temperature structure could be well approximated by a radiative-convective equilibrium model with two critical lapse rates—the moist adiabatic lapse rate and the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 219 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Lapse rates, moist adiabatic lapse rates and the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment are calculated and compared for the mean annual, January and July states in the Northern Hemisphere. In the troposphere above the planetary boundary layer zonal mean lapse rates are within 20% of the moist adiabatic lapse rate from the equator up to about 30°N in January and 50°N in July, but are appreciably more stable in higher latitudes. The latitudinal distribution of tropospheric mean lapse rates clearly delineates two regimes in the atmosphere—a low-latitude regime where the lapse rates are essentially moist adiabatic, and a high-latitude regime where the lapse rates are essentially the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment. The dividing point between the two regimes shifts from 28°N in January to 47°N in July, and the transition is less sharp in July than in January. The absence of appreciable seasonal changes in lapse rates in midlatitudes can be attributed to counterbalancing seasonal changes in the strength of moist convection and baroclinic eddies. Hemispheric mean lapse rates in the mid and lower troposphere are within 0.4 K km−1 of the moist adiabatic lapse rate in July, but are as much as 1.9 K km−1 less in January. Implications for simple climate models are discussed. A principal conclusion is that the vertical temperature structure could be well approximated by a radiative-convective equilibrium model with two critical lapse rates—the moist adiabatic lapse rate and the critical lapse rate for baroclinic adjustment.

Key concepts: Lapse rate, Baroclinity, Troposphere, Atmospheric sciences, Equator, Climatology, Adiabatic process, Atmosphere (unit)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Atmospheric Lapse Rate Regimes and Their Parameterization — Research Paper | ScholarLens