Episiotomy and perineal trauma during childbirth
Gunny Röckner, Vivian Wahlberg, Anders Ölund
Abstract
Gunny Röckner, Vivian Wahlberg, Anders Ölund
Abstract
A study was conducted to assess the frequency of episiotomy and spontaneous tears in 807 primiparas during singleton births. The incidence of episiotomy was 50%, spontaneous tears 22% and intact perineum 28%. A significantly lower frequency of episiotomy (P less than 0.001) as well as epidural anaesthesia (P less than 0.001) was found among immigrant women. There were no indications registered for 58% of the episiotomies. The non-episiotomy group experienced more clitoris/labia tears (P less than 0.01). On the other hand there was a tendency towards an increased risk for second and third degree tears, 4.2% in the episiotomy group compared to 1.7% in the non-episiotomy group (P = 0.06). Haemorrhage (greater than 600 ml) was more frequent in the episiotomy group than in the non-episiotomy group (P less than 0.001). We conclude that there is little support for the claim that episiotomy prevents tears in normal deliveries, and that the rationale for the practice of episiotomy is in need of reappraisal.
OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A study was conducted to assess the frequency of episiotomy and spontaneous tears in 807 primiparas during singleton births. The incidence of episiotomy was 50%, spontaneous tears 22% and intact perineum 28%. A significantly lower frequency of episiotomy (P less than 0.001) as well as epidural anaesthesia (P less than 0.001) was found among immigrant women. There were no indications registered for 58% of the episiotomies. The non-episiotomy group experienced more clitoris/labia tears (P less than 0.01). On the other hand there was a tendency towards an increased risk for second and third degree tears, 4.2% in the episiotomy group compared to 1.7% in the non-episiotomy group (P = 0.06). Haemorrhage (greater than 600 ml) was more frequent in the episiotomy group than in the non-episiotomy group (P less than 0.001). We conclude that there is little support for the claim that episiotomy prevents tears in normal deliveries, and that the rationale for the practice of episiotomy is in need of reappraisal.
Key concepts: Episiotomy, Childbirth, Perineum, Medicine, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Surgery, Biology