2009•Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapyRequires access

Prasugrel: A Critical Comparison with Clopidogrel

Kurt M. Reinhart, Charles Michael White, William L. Baker

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

Thienopyridine antiplatelet drugs have been used for 15 years for the prevention of coronary stent thrombosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement. Ticlopidine, the first approved thienopyridine, has in large part been replaced by clopidogrel, a more potent and better tolerated thienopyridine. Now, prasugrel, the newest agent, is currently available for use in the United States. Although prasugrel is similar to clopidogrel, it is about 10 times more potent and has a quicker onset of action. Data from the largest trial comparing clopidogrel and prasugrel indicate that this increased potency and quicker onset of prasugrel equate to a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, although higher rates of major bleeding were reported. Prasugrel also differs from clopidogrel in that it may be less prone to drug-drug interactions and patient nonresponsiveness, although further research is needed in both of these areas. Given the totality of data available, prasugrel appears to be a promising treatment option for patients with acute coronary syndromes who are undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thienopyridine antiplatelet drugs have been used for 15 years for the prevention of coronary stent thrombosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement. Ticlopidine, the first approved thienopyridine, has in large part been replaced by clopidogrel, a more potent and better tolerated thienopyridine. Now, prasugrel, the newest agent, is currently available for use in the United States. Although prasugrel is similar to clopidogrel, it is about 10 times more potent and has a quicker onset of action. Data from the largest trial comparing clopidogrel and prasugrel indicate that this increased potency and quicker onset of prasugrel equate to a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, although higher rates of major bleeding were reported. Prasugrel also differs from clopidogrel in that it may be less prone to drug-drug interactions and patient nonresponsiveness, although further research is needed in both of these areas. Given the totality of data available, prasugrel appears to be a promising treatment option for patients with acute coronary syndromes who are undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thienopyridine antiplatelet drugs have been used for 15 years for the prevention of coronary stent thrombosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement. Ticlopidine, the first approved thienopyridine, has in large part been replaced by clopidogrel, a more potent and better tolerated thienopyridine. Now, prasugrel, the newest agent, is currently available for use in the United States. Although prasugrel is similar to clopidogrel, it is about 10 times more potent and has a quicker onset of action. Data from the largest trial comparing clopidogrel and prasugrel indicate that this increased potency and quicker onset of prasugrel equate to a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, although higher rates of major bleeding were reported. Prasugrel also differs from clopidogrel in that it may be less prone to drug-drug interactions and patient nonresponsiveness, although further research is needed in both of these areas. Given the totality of data available, prasugrel appears to be a promising treatment option for patients with acute coronary syndromes who are undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Key concepts: Prasugrel, Medicine, Clopidogrel, Internal medicine, Aspirin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prasugrel: A Critical Comparison with Clopidogrel — Research Paper | ScholarLens