2012International Journal of Nuclear LawRequires access

Limping legislation - viability of the Indian Nuclear Liability Act within the constitutional scheme

Tanavi Mohanty, Aayush Kumar

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

India’s launch into the international nuclear regime has been controversial with allegations of being unconstitutional being levied on its liability legislation, the Civil Liability Act. This paper proposes to argue the legality of the legislation on the parameters of Constitutional mandates in fundamental rights of life, liberty and equality. On dissection, it finds the legislation in breach of environmental principles recognised in both national and international legal regimes. The Act is hit by arbitrariness of state action in many of its provisions. Finally, the eviction of Courts from the compensatory mechanism rounds up the attack. The gravity of the issue has been examined in the matrix of imminent dangers of dealing with nuclear energy. In its last limb, the paper proposes a correction of the Act to put the law onto an effective road to implementation and suggests ways to put it into action.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

India’s launch into the international nuclear regime has been controversial with allegations of being unconstitutional being levied on its liability legislation, the Civil Liability Act. This paper proposes to argue the legality of the legislation on the parameters of Constitutional mandates in fundamental rights of life, liberty and equality. On dissection, it finds the legislation in breach of environmental principles recognised in both national and international legal regimes. The Act is hit by arbitrariness of state action in many of its provisions. Finally, the eviction of Courts from the compensatory mechanism rounds up the attack. The gravity of the issue has been examined in the matrix of imminent dangers of dealing with nuclear energy. In its last limb, the paper proposes a correction of the Act to put the law onto an effective road to implementation and suggests ways to put it into action.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

India’s launch into the international nuclear regime has been controversial with allegations of being unconstitutional being levied on its liability legislation, the Civil Liability Act. This paper proposes to argue the legality of the legislation on the parameters of Constitutional mandates in fundamental rights of life, liberty and equality. On dissection, it finds the legislation in breach of environmental principles recognised in both national and international legal regimes. The Act is hit by arbitrariness of state action in many of its provisions. Finally, the eviction of Courts from the compensatory mechanism rounds up the attack. The gravity of the issue has been examined in the matrix of imminent dangers of dealing with nuclear energy. In its last limb, the paper proposes a correction of the Act to put the law onto an effective road to implementation and suggests ways to put it into action.

Key concepts: Legislation, Principle of legality, Law, Liability, Political science, Tort, Law and economics, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Limping legislation - viability of the Indian Nuclear Liability Act within the constitutional scheme — Research Paper | ScholarLens