1996•Psychological AssessmentRequires access

Validity and time savings in the selection of short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised.

Leigh C. Ward, Joseph J. Ryan

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Validity and reliability were calculated from data in the standardization sample of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised WAIS-R ; D. Wechsler, 1981) for 565 short forms. Percentage of time savings in comparison to the full WAIS-R was estimated for each subtest combination from the data of J. J. Ryan and S. J. Rosenberg (1984), and short forms were rank-ordered, according to validity, within 5% intervals from 45% to 90% savings. The most efficient combinations for predicting total scores were generally those composed of subtests that are quick to administer, and short forms selected in previous research because of their brief administration times proved to be efficient in comparison to other subtest combinations. Several short forms from each time-savings category had acceptable validities and reliabilities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Validity and reliability were calculated from data in the standardization sample of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised WAIS-R ; D. Wechsler, 1981) for 565 short forms. Percentage of time savings in comparison to the full WAIS-R was estimated for each subtest combination from the data of J. J. Ryan and S. J. Rosenberg (1984), and short forms were rank-ordered, according to validity, within 5% intervals from 45% to 90% savings. The most efficient combinations for predicting total scores were generally those composed of subtests that are quick to administer, and short forms selected in previous research because of their brief administration times proved to be efficient in comparison to other subtest combinations. Several short forms from each time-savings category had acceptable validities and reliabilities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Validity and reliability were calculated from data in the standardization sample of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised WAIS-R ; D. Wechsler, 1981) for 565 short forms. Percentage of time savings in comparison to the full WAIS-R was estimated for each subtest combination from the data of J. J. Ryan and S. J. Rosenberg (1984), and short forms were rank-ordered, according to validity, within 5% intervals from 45% to 90% savings. The most efficient combinations for predicting total scores were generally those composed of subtests that are quick to administer, and short forms selected in previous research because of their brief administration times proved to be efficient in comparison to other subtest combinations. Several short forms from each time-savings category had acceptable validities and reliabilities.

Key concepts: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Psychology, Short Forms, Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Test validity, Psychometrics, Selection (genetic algorithm), Predictive validity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Validity and time savings in the selection of short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. — Research Paper | ScholarLens