1990Management ScienceRequires access

Environment, Market Share, and Market Power

William Boulding, Richard Staelin

Open publisher page 143 citations

Abstract

In this paper we develop a process model relating market share to firm profits. In particular, we specify average price and average cost equations as a function of previous year market share position, changes in market share, environmental conditions, and interactions of environmental conditions with the lagged market position and market share change variables. We estimate these equations using PIMS data after controlling for unobservable factors. Our results suggest that firms with high market shares derive no extra market power benefits except if they operate in environments with little buyer power. Instead, environmental factors and changes in market share most strongly influence price and cost. An analysis of the market share associated with maximal firm profits indicates that for the majority of firms in our sample steadily increasing market share does not always associate with increasing profits, giving credence to the proposition that “more market share is not always better.”

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper we develop a process model relating market share to firm profits. In particular, we specify average price and average cost equations as a function of previous year market share position, changes in market share, environmental conditions, and interactions of environmental conditions with the lagged market position and market share change variables. We estimate these equations using PIMS data after controlling for unobservable factors. Our results suggest that firms with high market shares derive no extra market power benefits except if they operate in environments with little buyer power. Instead, environmental factors and changes in market share most strongly influence price and cost. An analysis of the market share associated with maximal firm profits indicates that for the majority of firms in our sample steadily increasing market share does not always associate with increasing profits, giving credence to the proposition that “more market share is not always better.”

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 143 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper we develop a process model relating market share to firm profits. In particular, we specify average price and average cost equations as a function of previous year market share position, changes in market share, environmental conditions, and interactions of environmental conditions with the lagged market position and market share change variables. We estimate these equations using PIMS data after controlling for unobservable factors. Our results suggest that firms with high market shares derive no extra market power benefits except if they operate in environments with little buyer power. Instead, environmental factors and changes in market share most strongly influence price and cost. An analysis of the market share associated with maximal firm profits indicates that for the majority of firms in our sample steadily increasing market share does not always associate with increasing profits, giving credence to the proposition that “more market share is not always better.”

Key concepts: Market share analysis, Market share, Market power, Unobservable, Market saturation, Factor market, Market microstructure, Position (finance)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Environment, Market Share, and Market Power — Research Paper | ScholarLens