1974•Journal of the Atmospheric SciencesRequires access

Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Versus Radar Reflectivity in Oklahoma Thunderstorms

Gilbert D. Kinzer

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Sferic pulse-train amplitudes and arrival times were used to locate lightning flashes and correlate cloud-to-ground (C–G) lightning with radar reflectivity in two typical Oklahoma storm systems. One system was a squall line lasting about 6 hr and producing detailed azimuthal displays of at least six individual storms with C–G lightning. The second system was a group of weaker air mass thunderstorms lasting about 3 hr. Although lightning counts per unit time varied widely between storms and within the same storm, the correlation of lightning counts with the radial extent of radar reflectivity factors ≥550 mm6 m−3 was fair. A rough correlation existed between C–G lightning counts and the amount of rainfall. The overall average rate of one cloud-to-ground flash per 1.6 × 1010 gm of rainfall found in a limited number of storms compares with Battan's report of one flash per 3 × 1010 gm. Even though there was some uncertainty about the rainfall measurements, the Oklahoma results support the opinion that in a developing thunderstorm the number of C–G flashes increases more rapidly than the rainfall.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sferic pulse-train amplitudes and arrival times were used to locate lightning flashes and correlate cloud-to-ground (C–G) lightning with radar reflectivity in two typical Oklahoma storm systems. One system was a squall line lasting about 6 hr and producing detailed azimuthal displays of at least six individual storms with C–G lightning. The second system was a group of weaker air mass thunderstorms lasting about 3 hr. Although lightning counts per unit time varied widely between storms and within the same storm, the correlation of lightning counts with the radial extent of radar reflectivity factors ≥550 mm6 m−3 was fair. A rough correlation existed between C–G lightning counts and the amount of rainfall. The overall average rate of one cloud-to-ground flash per 1.6 × 1010 gm of rainfall found in a limited number of storms compares with Battan's report of one flash per 3 × 1010 gm. Even though there was some uncertainty about the rainfall measurements, the Oklahoma results support the opinion that in a developing thunderstorm the number of C–G flashes increases more rapidly than the rainfall.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sferic pulse-train amplitudes and arrival times were used to locate lightning flashes and correlate cloud-to-ground (C–G) lightning with radar reflectivity in two typical Oklahoma storm systems. One system was a squall line lasting about 6 hr and producing detailed azimuthal displays of at least six individual storms with C–G lightning. The second system was a group of weaker air mass thunderstorms lasting about 3 hr. Although lightning counts per unit time varied widely between storms and within the same storm, the correlation of lightning counts with the radial extent of radar reflectivity factors ≥550 mm6 m−3 was fair. A rough correlation existed between C–G lightning counts and the amount of rainfall. The overall average rate of one cloud-to-ground flash per 1.6 × 1010 gm of rainfall found in a limited number of storms compares with Battan's report of one flash per 3 × 1010 gm. Even though there was some uncertainty about the rainfall measurements, the Oklahoma results support the opinion that in a developing thunderstorm the number of C–G flashes increases more rapidly than the rainfall.

Key concepts: Thunderstorm, Squall line, Lightning (connector), Storm, Meteorology, Radar, Environmental science, Convective storm detection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Versus Radar Reflectivity in Oklahoma Thunderstorms — Research Paper | ScholarLens