2004BloodOpen access

Evaluation of different methods of leukoreduction of donor platelets to prevent alloimmune platelet refractoriness and induce tolerance in a canine transfusion model

Sherrill J. Slichter, Douglas Fish, V. Kraig Abrams, Lakshmi K. Gaur, Karen Nelson, Doug Bolgiano

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

The effectiveness of different methods of leukoreduction in preventing alloimmune platelet refractoriness was evaluated in a canine model. Platelets from a random donor dog were administered for up to 8 weeks or until platelet refractoriness. Standard (STD; unmodified) platelets were accepted by 14% of recipients (n = 7) compared with 14% for centrifuge leukoreduced (C-LR) platelets (n = 21) and 31% for filter leukoreduced (F-LR) platelets (n = 13; no significant differences). Surprisingly, using both F-LR and C-LR platelets was highly effective (87% acceptance, n = 15). Transfusing F-LR/C-LR red blood cells (n = 4) or F-LR/C-LR plasma (n = 4), along with F-LR/C-LR platelets, did not affect platelet acceptance (100% acceptance). Overall acceptance of F-LR/C-LR platelets was 91% (n = 23; P < or = .05 versus STD, C-LR, or F-LR platelets). F-LR/C-LR transfusions also induced tolerance to subsequent STD platelet transfusions from the same donor (82% acceptance, n = 19) as well as to donor skin grafts without recipient immunosuppression (57% acceptance, n = 7). To evaluate mechanisms of tolerance induction, F-LR/C-LR platelets were gamma-irradiated. Although the gamma-irradiated F-LR/C-LR platelets were uniformly accepted (n = 6), tolerance to STD platelets was lost. These data suggest that some allostimulatory white cells are filter adherent, whereas others escape filtration but can be removed by centrifugation and tolerance requires a residual functioning white cell.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effectiveness of different methods of leukoreduction in preventing alloimmune platelet refractoriness was evaluated in a canine model. Platelets from a random donor dog were administered for up to 8 weeks or until platelet refractoriness. Standard (STD; unmodified) platelets were accepted by 14% of recipients (n = 7) compared with 14% for centrifuge leukoreduced (C-LR) platelets (n = 21) and 31% for filter leukoreduced (F-LR) platelets (n = 13; no significant differences). Surprisingly, using both F-LR and C-LR platelets was highly effective (87% acceptance, n = 15). Transfusing F-LR/C-LR red blood cells (n = 4) or F-LR/C-LR plasma (n = 4), along with F-LR/C-LR platelets, did not affect platelet acceptance (100% acceptance). Overall acceptance of F-LR/C-LR platelets was 91% (n = 23; P < or = .05 versus STD, C-LR, or F-LR platelets). F-LR/C-LR transfusions also induced tolerance to subsequent STD platelet transfusions from the same donor (82% acceptance, n = 19) as well as to donor skin grafts without recipient immunosuppression (57% acceptance, n = 7). To evaluate mechanisms of tolerance induction, F-LR/C-LR platelets were gamma-irradiated. Although the gamma-irradiated F-LR/C-LR platelets were uniformly accepted (n = 6), tolerance to STD platelets was lost. These data suggest that some allostimulatory white cells are filter adherent, whereas others escape filtration but can be removed by centrifugation and tolerance requires a residual functioning white cell.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effectiveness of different methods of leukoreduction in preventing alloimmune platelet refractoriness was evaluated in a canine model. Platelets from a random donor dog were administered for up to 8 weeks or until platelet refractoriness. Standard (STD; unmodified) platelets were accepted by 14% of recipients (n = 7) compared with 14% for centrifuge leukoreduced (C-LR) platelets (n = 21) and 31% for filter leukoreduced (F-LR) platelets (n = 13; no significant differences). Surprisingly, using both F-LR and C-LR platelets was highly effective (87% acceptance, n = 15). Transfusing F-LR/C-LR red blood cells (n = 4) or F-LR/C-LR plasma (n = 4), along with F-LR/C-LR platelets, did not affect platelet acceptance (100% acceptance). Overall acceptance of F-LR/C-LR platelets was 91% (n = 23; P < or = .05 versus STD, C-LR, or F-LR platelets). F-LR/C-LR transfusions also induced tolerance to subsequent STD platelet transfusions from the same donor (82% acceptance, n = 19) as well as to donor skin grafts without recipient immunosuppression (57% acceptance, n = 7). To evaluate mechanisms of tolerance induction, F-LR/C-LR platelets were gamma-irradiated. Although the gamma-irradiated F-LR/C-LR platelets were uniformly accepted (n = 6), tolerance to STD platelets was lost. These data suggest that some allostimulatory white cells are filter adherent, whereas others escape filtration but can be removed by centrifugation and tolerance requires a residual functioning white cell.

Key concepts: Platelet, Leukoreduction, Thrombopoiesis, Thrombopoietin, Platelet transfusion, Medicine, Immunology, Megakaryocytopoiesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of different methods of leukoreduction of donor platelets to prevent alloimmune platelet refractoriness and induce tolerance in a canine transfusion model — Research Paper | ScholarLens