2000Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsRequires access

Sequential versus non-sequential double ionization in strong laser fields

H. W. van der Hart

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

The recollision model has been applied to separate the probability for double ionization into contributions from electron-impact ionization and electron-impact excitation for intensities at which the dielectronic interaction is important for generating double ionization. For a wavelength of 780 nm, electron-impact excitation dominates just above the threshold intensity for double ionization, ≈1.2×10 14 W cm -2 , with electron-impact ionization becoming more important for higher intensities. For a wavelength of 390 nm, the ratio between electron-impact ionization and electron-impact excitation remains fairly constant for all intensities above the threshold intensity for double ionization, ≈6×10 14 W cm -2 . The results point to an explanation of the experimental results, but more detailed calculations on the behaviour of excited He + ions are required.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The recollision model has been applied to separate the probability for double ionization into contributions from electron-impact ionization and electron-impact excitation for intensities at which the dielectronic interaction is important for generating double ionization. For a wavelength of 780 nm, electron-impact excitation dominates just above the threshold intensity for double ionization, ≈1.2×10 14 W cm -2 , with electron-impact ionization becoming more important for higher intensities. For a wavelength of 390 nm, the ratio between electron-impact ionization and electron-impact excitation remains fairly constant for all intensities above the threshold intensity for double ionization, ≈6×10 14 W cm -2 . The results point to an explanation of the experimental results, but more detailed calculations on the behaviour of excited He + ions are required.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The recollision model has been applied to separate the probability for double ionization into contributions from electron-impact ionization and electron-impact excitation for intensities at which the dielectronic interaction is important for generating double ionization. For a wavelength of 780 nm, electron-impact excitation dominates just above the threshold intensity for double ionization, ≈1.2×10 14 W cm -2 , with electron-impact ionization becoming more important for higher intensities. For a wavelength of 390 nm, the ratio between electron-impact ionization and electron-impact excitation remains fairly constant for all intensities above the threshold intensity for double ionization, ≈6×10 14 W cm -2 . The results point to an explanation of the experimental results, but more detailed calculations on the behaviour of excited He + ions are required.

Key concepts: Ionization, Double ionization, Electron ionization, Physics, Atomic physics, Excited state, Excitation, Ion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sequential versus non-sequential double ionization in strong laser fields — Research Paper | ScholarLens