Decentralization in Botswana: the reluctant process
Kenneth Dipholo, Bashi Mothusi
Abstract
Kenneth Dipholo, Bashi Mothusi
Abstract
Botswana\'s decentralization process has always been justified in terms of democracy and development. Consequently, the government has always argued that it is fully committed to decentralization in order to promote popular participation as well as facilitating sustainable rural development. Yet the government does not seem to be supporting its own efforts towards decentralization beyond the mundane talk of capacity building. This article takes a closer look at the government\'s over-cautious approach to decentralization. The article analyses some of its better documented efforts towards promoting decentralization and how such efforts seem to lack the necessary internal politico-administrative support. Key words: centralized planning, state domination, district planning, unsustainable, top-down approach Journal of Social Development in Africa Vol.20(1) 2005: 40-58
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Botswana\'s decentralization process has always been justified in terms of democracy and development. Consequently, the government has always argued that it is fully committed to decentralization in order to promote popular participation as well as facilitating sustainable rural development. Yet the government does not seem to be supporting its own efforts towards decentralization beyond the mundane talk of capacity building. This article takes a closer look at the government\'s over-cautious approach to decentralization. The article analyses some of its better documented efforts towards promoting decentralization and how such efforts seem to lack the necessary internal politico-administrative support. Key words: centralized planning, state domination, district planning, unsustainable, top-down approach Journal of Social Development in Africa Vol.20(1) 2005: 40-58
Key concepts: Decentralization, Government (linguistics), Process (computing), Sustainable development, Democracy, Public administration, Order (exchange), Political science