2013Journal of Logic and ComputationRequires access

Realization using the model existence theorem

Melvin Fitting

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Justification logics refine modal logics by replacing the usual necessity operator with a family of justification terms that embody reasons for the necessity of a formula, rather than simply recording the fact of necessity. Many common modal logics have justification counterparts. The connection between a modal logic and its justification counterpart is through a Realization Theorem, which says that modal operators can be replaced in a precise way with justification terms so that modal theorems turn into justification logic theorems. In this article we present a new proof of Realization. We use the familiar machinery of consistency properties to prove a weak version, we call it Quasi-Realization. Then we show how to convert Quasi-Realizations into Realizations proper. Unlike most other treatments in the literature, the work here is not propositional, but first-order. Only one modal/justification logic is discussed, but the methods easily extend to other standard systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Justification logics refine modal logics by replacing the usual necessity operator with a family of justification terms that embody reasons for the necessity of a formula, rather than simply recording the fact of necessity. Many common modal logics have justification counterparts. The connection between a modal logic and its justification counterpart is through a Realization Theorem, which says that modal operators can be replaced in a precise way with justification terms so that modal theorems turn into justification logic theorems. In this article we present a new proof of Realization. We use the familiar machinery of consistency properties to prove a weak version, we call it Quasi-Realization. Then we show how to convert Quasi-Realizations into Realizations proper. Unlike most other treatments in the literature, the work here is not propositional, but first-order. Only one modal/justification logic is discussed, but the methods easily extend to other standard systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Justification logics refine modal logics by replacing the usual necessity operator with a family of justification terms that embody reasons for the necessity of a formula, rather than simply recording the fact of necessity. Many common modal logics have justification counterparts. The connection between a modal logic and its justification counterpart is through a Realization Theorem, which says that modal operators can be replaced in a precise way with justification terms so that modal theorems turn into justification logic theorems. In this article we present a new proof of Realization. We use the familiar machinery of consistency properties to prove a weak version, we call it Quasi-Realization. Then we show how to convert Quasi-Realizations into Realizations proper. Unlike most other treatments in the literature, the work here is not propositional, but first-order. Only one modal/justification logic is discussed, but the methods easily extend to other standard systems.

Key concepts: Realization (probability), Modal, Modal logic, Modal operator, Mathematics, Operator (biology), Consistency (knowledge bases), Normal modal logic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Realization using the model existence theorem — Research Paper | ScholarLens