1985Anesthesia & AnalgesiaRequires access

Epinephrine Does Not Prolong Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia in Term Parturients

David L. Spivey

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

The effect of adding epinephrine to spinal anesthesia performed with lidocaine in young, healthy patients was determined in a prospective, controlled, randomized double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received lidocaine in dextrose, and the other, lidocaine in dextrose plus epinephrine. Maximum segmental level, time to maximum level, and duration as determined by time to two-segment regression were determined for each of the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the observed parameters, most notably, duration. The present results substantiate those from a previous study in an older population that showed that epinephrine did not significantly prolong lidocaine spinal anesthesia. The present results do not, however, support the hypothesis based upon these earlier data that failure of epinephrine to prolong lidocaine spinal anesthesia is restricted to elderly patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effect of adding epinephrine to spinal anesthesia performed with lidocaine in young, healthy patients was determined in a prospective, controlled, randomized double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received lidocaine in dextrose, and the other, lidocaine in dextrose plus epinephrine. Maximum segmental level, time to maximum level, and duration as determined by time to two-segment regression were determined for each of the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the observed parameters, most notably, duration. The present results substantiate those from a previous study in an older population that showed that epinephrine did not significantly prolong lidocaine spinal anesthesia. The present results do not, however, support the hypothesis based upon these earlier data that failure of epinephrine to prolong lidocaine spinal anesthesia is restricted to elderly patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effect of adding epinephrine to spinal anesthesia performed with lidocaine in young, healthy patients was determined in a prospective, controlled, randomized double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received lidocaine in dextrose, and the other, lidocaine in dextrose plus epinephrine. Maximum segmental level, time to maximum level, and duration as determined by time to two-segment regression were determined for each of the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the observed parameters, most notably, duration. The present results substantiate those from a previous study in an older population that showed that epinephrine did not significantly prolong lidocaine spinal anesthesia. The present results do not, however, support the hypothesis based upon these earlier data that failure of epinephrine to prolong lidocaine spinal anesthesia is restricted to elderly patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Lidocaine, Epinephrine, Anesthesia, Spinal anesthesia, Population, Environmental health

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Epinephrine Does Not Prolong Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia in Term Parturients — Research Paper | ScholarLens