The activity of Sch 29482 against type b Haemophilus influenzae lacking or possessing detectable -lactamase activity
K. Wong, Marilyn C. Roberts, Arnold Lee Smith
Abstract
K. Wong, Marilyn C. Roberts, Arnold Lee Smith
Abstract
To gain insight into the potential role of Sch 29482 (SCH) in the treatment of Haemophillus influenzae infections, we examined the activity of this compound against 50 ampicillin-sensitive and 50 ampicillin-resistant strains, comparing its activity to cefaclor, cefamandole and moxalactam. All susceptibility testing was performed on supplemented BHI agar with 18 h incubation in 5% CO 2 at 37°C. With an inoculum of 10 5 cfu moxalactam was the most potent, while cefaclor was the least: cefaclor MIC 90% 8 0, cefamandole 2.0, SCH 0.5 and moxalactam 0.5 mg/l, respectively. If the inoculum is increased from 10 3 to 10 7 with both types of strains, there is a marked increase in apparent MIC to values not readily achievable in serum with standard doses. The apparent MIC increased 150-fold with cefaclor, 600-fold with cefamandole, 90-fold with moxalactam and 20-fold with SCH. We conclude that SCH is less potent than moxalactam, but its apparent MIC is considerably less affected by the inoculum used.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To gain insight into the potential role of Sch 29482 (SCH) in the treatment of Haemophillus influenzae infections, we examined the activity of this compound against 50 ampicillin-sensitive and 50 ampicillin-resistant strains, comparing its activity to cefaclor, cefamandole and moxalactam. All susceptibility testing was performed on supplemented BHI agar with 18 h incubation in 5% CO 2 at 37°C. With an inoculum of 10 5 cfu moxalactam was the most potent, while cefaclor was the least: cefaclor MIC 90% 8 0, cefamandole 2.0, SCH 0.5 and moxalactam 0.5 mg/l, respectively. If the inoculum is increased from 10 3 to 10 7 with both types of strains, there is a marked increase in apparent MIC to values not readily achievable in serum with standard doses. The apparent MIC increased 150-fold with cefaclor, 600-fold with cefamandole, 90-fold with moxalactam and 20-fold with SCH. We conclude that SCH is less potent than moxalactam, but its apparent MIC is considerably less affected by the inoculum used.
Key concepts: Moxalactam, Cefamandole, Cefaclor, Microbiology, Haemophilus influenzae, Cephalosporin, Ampicillin, Latamoxef