A Missing Tradition: Women Managing Charitable Organizations in Richmond, Virginia, 1805–1900
F. Ellen Netting, Mary Katherine O’Connor, David P. Fauri
Abstract
F. Ellen Netting, Mary Katherine O’Connor, David P. Fauri
Abstract
Historical research on charitable organizations in Richmond, Virginia, reveals the roles women played in founding, managing, and developing agencies that have survived since the 1800s. Findings from an examination of the records of 24 agencies and associated secondary sources suggest that many of the ways in which women worked reflect characteristics that writers would later describe as alternative, collectivist, and feminist. Women created traditions in Richmond that nurtured the growth and development of sustainable health and human service cultures. The study concludes that one such tradition, missing from the literature, describes typical patterns of work in charitable agencies. More than merely an alternative approach, this missing tradition has been obscured by dominant approaches that became privileged in human services management.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Historical research on charitable organizations in Richmond, Virginia, reveals the roles women played in founding, managing, and developing agencies that have survived since the 1800s. Findings from an examination of the records of 24 agencies and associated secondary sources suggest that many of the ways in which women worked reflect characteristics that writers would later describe as alternative, collectivist, and feminist. Women created traditions in Richmond that nurtured the growth and development of sustainable health and human service cultures. The study concludes that one such tradition, missing from the literature, describes typical patterns of work in charitable agencies. More than merely an alternative approach, this missing tradition has been obscured by dominant approaches that became privileged in human services management.
Key concepts: Collectivism, Human services, Work (physics), Sociology, Service (business), Political science, Gender studies, Public relations