2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Feasibility of Underbalance Drilling in Tight Gas Reservoirs – A New Approach

Thomas Finkbeiner, Satya Perumalla, Daniel Moos, Martin Brudy, Pavel Peška

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Deep, tight reservoirs face significant appraisal and development challenges. In particular, it can be difficult proving the presence and mobility of sufficient quantities of gas to make the reservoir economically viable. At the same time, drilling costs are extremely high. In this context, underbalanced drilling (UBD) provides a number of benefits: first, it enables the operator to proof (i.e., provide physical evidence for) the presence of producible quantities of gas (so-called “testing while drilling”) while the well is being drilled. Underbalanced drilling also can minimize formation damage and maximize the rate of penetration. This, combined with reduced use of expensive mud formulations, can result in significant savings of drilling and completion costs relative to conventional drilling. However, not all reservoirs are suitable for UBD as there is much greater risk of mechanical wellbore instabilities relative to wells drilled overbalanced. We present a new, realistic approach that enables to increase the accuracy of predictions and at the same time takes scale as well as time depenent effects into consideration. The results of this type of analysis can provide an invaluable help for tight gas reservoir exploration and production.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Deep, tight reservoirs face significant appraisal and development challenges. In particular, it can be difficult proving the presence and mobility of sufficient quantities of gas to make the reservoir economically viable. At the same time, drilling costs are extremely high. In this context, underbalanced drilling (UBD) provides a number of benefits: first, it enables the operator to proof (i.e., provide physical evidence for) the presence of producible quantities of gas (so-called “testing while drilling”) while the well is being drilled. Underbalanced drilling also can minimize formation damage and maximize the rate of penetration. This, combined with reduced use of expensive mud formulations, can result in significant savings of drilling and completion costs relative to conventional drilling. However, not all reservoirs are suitable for UBD as there is much greater risk of mechanical wellbore instabilities relative to wells drilled overbalanced. We present a new, realistic approach that enables to increase the accuracy of predictions and at the same time takes scale as well as time depenent effects into consideration. The results of this type of analysis can provide an invaluable help for tight gas reservoir exploration and production.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Deep, tight reservoirs face significant appraisal and development challenges. In particular, it can be difficult proving the presence and mobility of sufficient quantities of gas to make the reservoir economically viable. At the same time, drilling costs are extremely high. In this context, underbalanced drilling (UBD) provides a number of benefits: first, it enables the operator to proof (i.e., provide physical evidence for) the presence of producible quantities of gas (so-called “testing while drilling”) while the well is being drilled. Underbalanced drilling also can minimize formation damage and maximize the rate of penetration. This, combined with reduced use of expensive mud formulations, can result in significant savings of drilling and completion costs relative to conventional drilling. However, not all reservoirs are suitable for UBD as there is much greater risk of mechanical wellbore instabilities relative to wells drilled overbalanced. We present a new, realistic approach that enables to increase the accuracy of predictions and at the same time takes scale as well as time depenent effects into consideration. The results of this type of analysis can provide an invaluable help for tight gas reservoir exploration and production.

Key concepts: Underbalanced drilling, Drilling, Petroleum engineering, Tight gas, Wellbore, Context (archaeology), Rate of penetration, Measurement while drilling

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feasibility of Underbalance Drilling in Tight Gas Reservoirs – A New Approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens