Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration in Distinguishing Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Andrew A. Renshaw, Kenneth R. Lee, Rebecca Madge, Scott R. Granter
Abstract
Andrew A. Renshaw, Kenneth R. Lee, Rebecca Madge, Scott R. Granter
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cytologic features of each subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for separating the various subtypes. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-eight renal fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens with surgical resection follow-up were retrospectively reviewed and classified without knowledge of the resection specimen diagnosis. These included 18 clear cell RCCs, 8 papillary RCCs, 4 oncocytomas, 2 chromophobe RCCs, 2 sarcomatoid RCCs and 4 metastases to the kidney. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of the primary renal lesions were correctly classified. All 4 oncocytomas and the 2 chromophobe tumors were correctly classified, while both sarcomatoid RCCs and 3 of 8 papillary RCCs were misclassified as clear cell RCC. One clear cell RCC was misclassified as papillary type. Two clear cell and one papillary RCC were nondiagnostic; in each case the tumor had a prominent cystic component. All four metastases were correctly identified. CONCLUSION: Subclassification of RCC by FNA is relatively accurate. In this study, the most common error was to misclassify papillary and sarcomatoid RCC as clear cell RCC.
OpenAlex reports 107 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cytologic features of each subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for separating the various subtypes. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-eight renal fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens with surgical resection follow-up were retrospectively reviewed and classified without knowledge of the resection specimen diagnosis. These included 18 clear cell RCCs, 8 papillary RCCs, 4 oncocytomas, 2 chromophobe RCCs, 2 sarcomatoid RCCs and 4 metastases to the kidney. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of the primary renal lesions were correctly classified. All 4 oncocytomas and the 2 chromophobe tumors were correctly classified, while both sarcomatoid RCCs and 3 of 8 papillary RCCs were misclassified as clear cell RCC. One clear cell RCC was misclassified as papillary type. Two clear cell and one papillary RCC were nondiagnostic; in each case the tumor had a prominent cystic component. All four metastases were correctly identified. CONCLUSION: Subclassification of RCC by FNA is relatively accurate. In this study, the most common error was to misclassify papillary and sarcomatoid RCC as clear cell RCC.
Key concepts: Chromophobe cell, Medicine, Clear cell, Papillary renal cell carcinomas, Renal cell carcinoma, Fine-needle aspiration, Pathology, Papillary carcinoma