1992Geomicrobiology JournalRequires access

Effects of manganese oxide mineralogy on microbial and chemical manganese reduction

David J. Burdige, Surya P. Dhakar, Kenneth H. Nealson

Open publisher page 114 citations

Abstract

In this study we examine the effects of manganese oxide mineralogy and crystal structure on two types of manganese reduction: microbial manganese reduction coupled to the oxidation of organic matter, and chemical reduction of manganese oxides by Fe2+. Three synthetic manganese minerals were used: δ‐MnO2 (or vernadite), Mg‐bimessite, and pyrolusite. The δ‐MnO2 and Mg‐birnessite are relatively high‐surface‐area amorphous materials, while the pyrolusite is a low‐surface‐area crystalline solid. Studies of microbial manganese reduction were carried out using an enrichment culture isolated from sediments in the mesohaline region of the Chesapeake Bay, and with a pure culture of the organism Shewanella (formerly Alteromonas,) putrefaciens strain MR‐1. With the Chesapeake Bay enrichment culture, identical rates of manganese reduction were observed with equivalent initial suspension concentrations of all three manganese minerals. This occurred in spite of ∼ 200‐fold differences in the available surface area of either of the amorphous phases relative to the crystalline pyrolusite. In contrast, the reduction of manganese oxides by strain MR‐1 showed a strong dependence on the particular oxide being reduced. Here, the highly crystalline pyrolusite was reduced at a slower rate than either the amorphous δ‐MnO2 or birnessite phase. The reduction of manganese oxides by Fe2+ also showed a strong dependence on the particular oxide being reduced. The effects observed here were similar to those observed with microbial manganese reduction by strain MR‐1. These results indicate that the controls on manganese reduction may differ depending on the rates and mechanisms of the process. Both manganese reduction by Fe2+ and microbial manganese reduction appear to be controlled by reactions occurring on the oxide surface. However, for microbial manganese reduction, the thermodynamic factors that can lead to differences in the reactivity of a manganese oxide mineral phase may also be overcome by kinetic factors that ultimately control the overall rate of the process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study we examine the effects of manganese oxide mineralogy and crystal structure on two types of manganese reduction: microbial manganese reduction coupled to the oxidation of organic matter, and chemical reduction of manganese oxides by Fe2+. Three synthetic manganese minerals were used: δ‐MnO2 (or vernadite), Mg‐bimessite, and pyrolusite. The δ‐MnO2 and Mg‐birnessite are relatively high‐surface‐area amorphous materials, while the pyrolusite is a low‐surface‐area crystalline solid. Studies of microbial manganese reduction were carried out using an enrichment culture isolated from sediments in the mesohaline region of the Chesapeake Bay, and with a pure culture of the organism Shewanella (formerly Alteromonas,) putrefaciens strain MR‐1. With the Chesapeake Bay enrichment culture, identical rates of manganese reduction were observed with equivalent initial suspension concentrations of all three manganese minerals. This occurred in spite of ∼ 200‐fold differences in the available surface area of either of the amorphous phases relative to the crystalline pyrolusite. In contrast, the reduction of manganese oxides by strain MR‐1 showed a strong dependence on the particular oxide being reduced. Here, the highly crystalline pyrolusite was reduced at a slower rate than either the amorphous δ‐MnO2 or birnessite phase. The reduction of manganese oxides by Fe2+ also showed a strong dependence on the particular oxide being reduced. The effects observed here were similar to those observed with microbial manganese reduction by strain MR‐1. These results indicate that the controls on manganese reduction may differ depending on the rates and mechanisms of the process. Both manganese reduction by Fe2+ and microbial manganese reduction appear to be controlled by reactions occurring on the oxide surface. However, for microbial manganese reduction, the thermodynamic factors that can lead to differences in the reactivity of a manganese oxide mineral phase may also be overcome by kinetic factors that ultimately control the overall rate of the process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 114 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study we examine the effects of manganese oxide mineralogy and crystal structure on two types of manganese reduction: microbial manganese reduction coupled to the oxidation of organic matter, and chemical reduction of manganese oxides by Fe2+. Three synthetic manganese minerals were used: δ‐MnO2 (or vernadite), Mg‐bimessite, and pyrolusite. The δ‐MnO2 and Mg‐birnessite are relatively high‐surface‐area amorphous materials, while the pyrolusite is a low‐surface‐area crystalline solid. Studies of microbial manganese reduction were carried out using an enrichment culture isolated from sediments in the mesohaline region of the Chesapeake Bay, and with a pure culture of the organism Shewanella (formerly Alteromonas,) putrefaciens strain MR‐1. With the Chesapeake Bay enrichment culture, identical rates of manganese reduction were observed with equivalent initial suspension concentrations of all three manganese minerals. This occurred in spite of ∼ 200‐fold differences in the available surface area of either of the amorphous phases relative to the crystalline pyrolusite. In contrast, the reduction of manganese oxides by strain MR‐1 showed a strong dependence on the particular oxide being reduced. Here, the highly crystalline pyrolusite was reduced at a slower rate than either the amorphous δ‐MnO2 or birnessite phase. The reduction of manganese oxides by Fe2+ also showed a strong dependence on the particular oxide being reduced. The effects observed here were similar to those observed with microbial manganese reduction by strain MR‐1. These results indicate that the controls on manganese reduction may differ depending on the rates and mechanisms of the process. Both manganese reduction by Fe2+ and microbial manganese reduction appear to be controlled by reactions occurring on the oxide surface. However, for microbial manganese reduction, the thermodynamic factors that can lead to differences in the reactivity of a manganese oxide mineral phase may also be overcome by kinetic factors that ultimately control the overall rate of the process.

Key concepts: Pyrolusite, Manganese, Birnessite, Chemistry, Bixbyite, Inorganic chemistry, Oxidizing agent, Oxide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of manganese oxide mineralogy on microbial and chemical manganese reduction — Research Paper | ScholarLens