2005RespirologyRequires access

Comparison of sputum induction using inhaled methacholine or hypertonic saline

Alan L. JAMES, Peta S. Maxwell, John Elliot

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hypertonic saline is recommended for the induction of sputum to assess airway inflammation. Methacholine is most commonly used to assess airway responsiveness. The aim of this study was to compare sputum induction by methacholine and hypertonic saline challenges, and the subsequent inflammatory cell differential counts. METHODOLOGY: Subjects (n = 56) underwent inhaled hypertonic saline (4.5% for < or = 15 min without bronchodilator pretreatment) and methacholine (maximum cumulative dose 4 micromol) challenges 1 week apart, in random order. Sputum was processed, and on cytospins stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa, a total of 400 inflammatory plus squamous cells were counted to obtain a differential cell count. RESULTS: A satisfactory sputum sample was obtained from 29 subjects following hypertonic saline and also from 10 subjects following methacholine. For these 10 subjects, the mean percent macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes were similar after methacholine (64%, 26%, 7% and 1%) or hypertonic saline (67%, 26%, 6% and 1%). The results were similar for squamous cells (42% and 45%) and when asthmatics and nonasthmatics were compared separately. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled methacholine has a much lower yield of sputum induction compared with hypertonic saline. However, the differential sputum cell count is similar following both challenge agents.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: Hypertonic saline is recommended for the induction of sputum to assess airway inflammation. Methacholine is most commonly used to assess airway responsiveness. The aim of this study was to compare sputum induction by methacholine and hypertonic saline challenges, and the subsequent inflammatory cell differential counts. METHODOLOGY: Subjects (n = 56) underwent inhaled hypertonic saline (4.5% for < or = 15 min without bronchodilator pretreatment) and methacholine (maximum cumulative dose 4 micromol) challenges 1 week apart, in random order. Sputum was processed, and on cytospins stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa, a total of 400 inflammatory plus squamous cells were counted to obtain a differential cell count. RESULTS: A satisfactory sputum sample was obtained from 29 subjects following hypertonic saline and also from 10 subjects following methacholine. For these 10 subjects, the mean percent macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes were similar after methacholine (64%, 26%, 7% and 1%) or hypertonic saline (67%, 26%, 6% and 1%). The results were similar for squamous cells (42% and 45%) and when asthmatics and nonasthmatics were compared separately. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled methacholine has a much lower yield of sputum induction compared with hypertonic saline. However, the differential sputum cell count is similar following both challenge agents.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hypertonic saline is recommended for the induction of sputum to assess airway inflammation. Methacholine is most commonly used to assess airway responsiveness. The aim of this study was to compare sputum induction by methacholine and hypertonic saline challenges, and the subsequent inflammatory cell differential counts. METHODOLOGY: Subjects (n = 56) underwent inhaled hypertonic saline (4.5% for < or = 15 min without bronchodilator pretreatment) and methacholine (maximum cumulative dose 4 micromol) challenges 1 week apart, in random order. Sputum was processed, and on cytospins stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa, a total of 400 inflammatory plus squamous cells were counted to obtain a differential cell count. RESULTS: A satisfactory sputum sample was obtained from 29 subjects following hypertonic saline and also from 10 subjects following methacholine. For these 10 subjects, the mean percent macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes were similar after methacholine (64%, 26%, 7% and 1%) or hypertonic saline (67%, 26%, 6% and 1%). The results were similar for squamous cells (42% and 45%) and when asthmatics and nonasthmatics were compared separately. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled methacholine has a much lower yield of sputum induction compared with hypertonic saline. However, the differential sputum cell count is similar following both challenge agents.

Key concepts: Hypertonic saline, Methacholine, Medicine, Sputum, Saline, Inhalation, Tonicity, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of sputum induction using inhaled methacholine or hypertonic saline — Research Paper | ScholarLens