2009•College literatureRequires access

The Penelopiad and Weight : Contemporary Parodic and Burlesque Transformations of Classical Myths

Hilde Staels

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

This essay closely examines the narrative form of Margaret Atwood’s and Jeanette Winterson’s revisionary stories about the mythical figures Penelope and Atlas. Both novelists rely on the narrative tools of parody and burlesque travesty to challenge the genre conventions of high epic art. They parodically use mythologizing and de-mythologizing devices to achieve a semantic transformation of the classical myths and employ burlesque travesty to bring about their stylistic modification. The revision of the ancient mythical stories is underscored by the prominent use of the trickster transformation archetype. In both The Penelopiad and Weight , the protagonists wish to liberate themselves from the limitations imposed on them by the traditional narratives. Atlas’s desire to break free from the boundaries of the ancient epic story world is explored alongside the desire of Winterson’s alter ego to free herself from the weight of her personal past and the burden of tyrannical (fictional) conventions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay closely examines the narrative form of Margaret Atwood’s and Jeanette Winterson’s revisionary stories about the mythical figures Penelope and Atlas. Both novelists rely on the narrative tools of parody and burlesque travesty to challenge the genre conventions of high epic art. They parodically use mythologizing and de-mythologizing devices to achieve a semantic transformation of the classical myths and employ burlesque travesty to bring about their stylistic modification. The revision of the ancient mythical stories is underscored by the prominent use of the trickster transformation archetype. In both The Penelopiad and Weight , the protagonists wish to liberate themselves from the limitations imposed on them by the traditional narratives. Atlas’s desire to break free from the boundaries of the ancient epic story world is explored alongside the desire of Winterson’s alter ego to free herself from the weight of her personal past and the burden of tyrannical (fictional) conventions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay closely examines the narrative form of Margaret Atwood’s and Jeanette Winterson’s revisionary stories about the mythical figures Penelope and Atlas. Both novelists rely on the narrative tools of parody and burlesque travesty to challenge the genre conventions of high epic art. They parodically use mythologizing and de-mythologizing devices to achieve a semantic transformation of the classical myths and employ burlesque travesty to bring about their stylistic modification. The revision of the ancient mythical stories is underscored by the prominent use of the trickster transformation archetype. In both The Penelopiad and Weight , the protagonists wish to liberate themselves from the limitations imposed on them by the traditional narratives. Atlas’s desire to break free from the boundaries of the ancient epic story world is explored alongside the desire of Winterson’s alter ego to free herself from the weight of her personal past and the burden of tyrannical (fictional) conventions.

Key concepts: Burlesque, Trickster, Literature, Mythology, Narrative, Archetype, Dystopia, Subversion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Penelopiad and Weight : Contemporary Parodic and Burlesque Transformations of Classical Myths — Research Paper | ScholarLens