2009Journal of the American Podiatric Medical AssociationRequires access

Metatarsal Protrusion Angle

Gabriel Domínguez-Maldonado, Pedro V. Munuera-Martínez, Mercedes Lomas

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We performed an adaptation of the system of evaluation of metatarsal protrusion described by Oller in 1994 to study the metatarsal parabola group. METHODS: The system of measurement was applied to the five metatarsals of 169 normal feet (72 feet of women and 97 feet of men) according to the inclusion criteria established. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD metatarsal protrusion angle with respect to the second ray in women was 87.49 degrees +/- 5.48 degrees for metatarsal I, 70.00 degrees +/- 5.74 degrees for metatarsal III, 63.47 degrees +/- 4.17 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 56.38 degrees +/- 3.27 degrees for metatarsal V. In men, the values were 85.30 degrees +/- 6.75 degrees for metatarsal I, 68.00 degrees +/- 6.72 degrees for metatarsal III, 60.56 degrees +/- 4.61 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 54.13 degrees +/- 3.75 degrees for metatarsal V. The comparative analysis between women and men showed significant differences (P < .05) for all of the values of metatarsal protrusion. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative analysis between women and men indicates a possible difference between the anthropometric values of these variables in humans, suggesting a possible repercussion on the biomechanical patterns by sex.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: We performed an adaptation of the system of evaluation of metatarsal protrusion described by Oller in 1994 to study the metatarsal parabola group. METHODS: The system of measurement was applied to the five metatarsals of 169 normal feet (72 feet of women and 97 feet of men) according to the inclusion criteria established. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD metatarsal protrusion angle with respect to the second ray in women was 87.49 degrees +/- 5.48 degrees for metatarsal I, 70.00 degrees +/- 5.74 degrees for metatarsal III, 63.47 degrees +/- 4.17 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 56.38 degrees +/- 3.27 degrees for metatarsal V. In men, the values were 85.30 degrees +/- 6.75 degrees for metatarsal I, 68.00 degrees +/- 6.72 degrees for metatarsal III, 60.56 degrees +/- 4.61 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 54.13 degrees +/- 3.75 degrees for metatarsal V. The comparative analysis between women and men showed significant differences (P < .05) for all of the values of metatarsal protrusion. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative analysis between women and men indicates a possible difference between the anthropometric values of these variables in humans, suggesting a possible repercussion on the biomechanical patterns by sex.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: We performed an adaptation of the system of evaluation of metatarsal protrusion described by Oller in 1994 to study the metatarsal parabola group. METHODS: The system of measurement was applied to the five metatarsals of 169 normal feet (72 feet of women and 97 feet of men) according to the inclusion criteria established. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD metatarsal protrusion angle with respect to the second ray in women was 87.49 degrees +/- 5.48 degrees for metatarsal I, 70.00 degrees +/- 5.74 degrees for metatarsal III, 63.47 degrees +/- 4.17 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 56.38 degrees +/- 3.27 degrees for metatarsal V. In men, the values were 85.30 degrees +/- 6.75 degrees for metatarsal I, 68.00 degrees +/- 6.72 degrees for metatarsal III, 60.56 degrees +/- 4.61 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 54.13 degrees +/- 3.75 degrees for metatarsal V. The comparative analysis between women and men showed significant differences (P < .05) for all of the values of metatarsal protrusion. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative analysis between women and men indicates a possible difference between the anthropometric values of these variables in humans, suggesting a possible repercussion on the biomechanical patterns by sex.

Key concepts: Medicine, First metatarsal, Metatarsal bones, Orthodontics, Significant difference, Anatomy, Osteotomy, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Metatarsal Protrusion Angle — Research Paper | ScholarLens