Metatarsal Protrusion Angle
Gabriel Domínguez-Maldonado, Pedro V. Munuera-Martínez, Mercedes Lomas
Abstract
Gabriel Domínguez-Maldonado, Pedro V. Munuera-Martínez, Mercedes Lomas
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We performed an adaptation of the system of evaluation of metatarsal protrusion described by Oller in 1994 to study the metatarsal parabola group. METHODS: The system of measurement was applied to the five metatarsals of 169 normal feet (72 feet of women and 97 feet of men) according to the inclusion criteria established. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD metatarsal protrusion angle with respect to the second ray in women was 87.49 degrees +/- 5.48 degrees for metatarsal I, 70.00 degrees +/- 5.74 degrees for metatarsal III, 63.47 degrees +/- 4.17 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 56.38 degrees +/- 3.27 degrees for metatarsal V. In men, the values were 85.30 degrees +/- 6.75 degrees for metatarsal I, 68.00 degrees +/- 6.72 degrees for metatarsal III, 60.56 degrees +/- 4.61 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 54.13 degrees +/- 3.75 degrees for metatarsal V. The comparative analysis between women and men showed significant differences (P < .05) for all of the values of metatarsal protrusion. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative analysis between women and men indicates a possible difference between the anthropometric values of these variables in humans, suggesting a possible repercussion on the biomechanical patterns by sex.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: We performed an adaptation of the system of evaluation of metatarsal protrusion described by Oller in 1994 to study the metatarsal parabola group. METHODS: The system of measurement was applied to the five metatarsals of 169 normal feet (72 feet of women and 97 feet of men) according to the inclusion criteria established. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD metatarsal protrusion angle with respect to the second ray in women was 87.49 degrees +/- 5.48 degrees for metatarsal I, 70.00 degrees +/- 5.74 degrees for metatarsal III, 63.47 degrees +/- 4.17 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 56.38 degrees +/- 3.27 degrees for metatarsal V. In men, the values were 85.30 degrees +/- 6.75 degrees for metatarsal I, 68.00 degrees +/- 6.72 degrees for metatarsal III, 60.56 degrees +/- 4.61 degrees for metatarsal IV, and 54.13 degrees +/- 3.75 degrees for metatarsal V. The comparative analysis between women and men showed significant differences (P < .05) for all of the values of metatarsal protrusion. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative analysis between women and men indicates a possible difference between the anthropometric values of these variables in humans, suggesting a possible repercussion on the biomechanical patterns by sex.
Key concepts: Medicine, First metatarsal, Metatarsal bones, Orthodontics, Significant difference, Anatomy, Osteotomy, Internal medicine