The Use of Pentazocine as a Strong Analgesic in Urological Practice
Rodney J. Scott, W W Barrie, R. W. Simpson, D. G. Bell
Abstract
Rodney J. Scott, W W Barrie, R. W. Simpson, D. G. Bell
Abstract
Summary In a double‐blind between‐patient study the analgesic efficacy of pentazocine and pethidine was compared in urological practice. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 drug groups although the duration of action of pentazocine seemed to be slightly shorter than that of pethidine. Side‐effects were infrequent with either drug anld it was concluded that pentazocine is a suitable alternative to pethidine in urological practice.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Summary In a double‐blind between‐patient study the analgesic efficacy of pentazocine and pethidine was compared in urological practice. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 drug groups although the duration of action of pentazocine seemed to be slightly shorter than that of pethidine. Side‐effects were infrequent with either drug anld it was concluded that pentazocine is a suitable alternative to pethidine in urological practice.
Key concepts: Pentazocine, Pethidine, Analgesic, Medicine, Anesthesia, Drug, Pharmacology