2007Communications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisRequires access

Influence of Different Forms of Iron and Aluminum on the Nature of Soil Acidity of Some Inceptisols, Alfisols, and Ultisols

A. K. Dolui, Ajijul Haque Mondal

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Fifteen acid soils of Mizoram representing Ultisols and Inceptisols, and Madhya Pradesh, representing Alfisols, were studied to characterize the nature of acidity in relation to different forms of iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al). The mean contents of Fe and Al were extracted by various extracting reagents and were found to be in descending order as followed: dithionite>oxalate>pyrophosphate>ammonium acetate>KCl. The electrostatically bonded EB‐H+ and EB‐Al3+ acidity comprised 28.3 and 71.7% of exchangeable acidity whereas EB‐H+, EB‐Al3+, exchangeable, and pH‐dependent acidities comprised 9.8, 30.7, 40.5, and 59.5% of total potential acidity. All forms, of acidity showed significant correlation with pHk and organic carbon. Among the different forms, Fe and Al caused most of the variations in different forms of soil acidity but the effect of different forms of Al are more active and directly participate in the formation of EB‐H+, EB‐Al3+, and exchangeable acidity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fifteen acid soils of Mizoram representing Ultisols and Inceptisols, and Madhya Pradesh, representing Alfisols, were studied to characterize the nature of acidity in relation to different forms of iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al). The mean contents of Fe and Al were extracted by various extracting reagents and were found to be in descending order as followed: dithionite>oxalate>pyrophosphate>ammonium acetate>KCl. The electrostatically bonded EB‐H+ and EB‐Al3+ acidity comprised 28.3 and 71.7% of exchangeable acidity whereas EB‐H+, EB‐Al3+, exchangeable, and pH‐dependent acidities comprised 9.8, 30.7, 40.5, and 59.5% of total potential acidity. All forms, of acidity showed significant correlation with pHk and organic carbon. Among the different forms, Fe and Al caused most of the variations in different forms of soil acidity but the effect of different forms of Al are more active and directly participate in the formation of EB‐H+, EB‐Al3+, and exchangeable acidity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fifteen acid soils of Mizoram representing Ultisols and Inceptisols, and Madhya Pradesh, representing Alfisols, were studied to characterize the nature of acidity in relation to different forms of iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al). The mean contents of Fe and Al were extracted by various extracting reagents and were found to be in descending order as followed: dithionite>oxalate>pyrophosphate>ammonium acetate>KCl. The electrostatically bonded EB‐H+ and EB‐Al3+ acidity comprised 28.3 and 71.7% of exchangeable acidity whereas EB‐H+, EB‐Al3+, exchangeable, and pH‐dependent acidities comprised 9.8, 30.7, 40.5, and 59.5% of total potential acidity. All forms, of acidity showed significant correlation with pHk and organic carbon. Among the different forms, Fe and Al caused most of the variations in different forms of soil acidity but the effect of different forms of Al are more active and directly participate in the formation of EB‐H+, EB‐Al3+, and exchangeable acidity.

Key concepts: Ultisol, Inceptisol, Chemistry, Ammonium oxalate, Soil pH, Alfisol, Ammonium, Ammonium acetate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Different Forms of Iron and Aluminum on the Nature of Soil Acidity of Some Inceptisols, Alfisols, and Ultisols — Research Paper | ScholarLens