“The dead don't answer questionnaires”: Researching and writing historical geography
Alan R. H. Baker
Abstract
Alan R. H. Baker
Abstract
The focus of studies in historical geography upon some time or period in the past rather than in the present means that historical geography is constrained in ways that the practice of contemporary human geography is not. This paper considers some of the general problems encountered in researching and writing historical geography. In relation to research, it examines the identification of a research topic, and discusses the problems associated with making geographical interpretations from historical sources. It then addresses the issues which have to be resolved when writing historical geography. It concludes by affirming both the individual pleasure to be derived from work in historical geography and the mutual benefits to be gained from a dialogue between historical geographers and contemporary human geographers in their common search for historical understanding.
OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The focus of studies in historical geography upon some time or period in the past rather than in the present means that historical geography is constrained in ways that the practice of contemporary human geography is not. This paper considers some of the general problems encountered in researching and writing historical geography. In relation to research, it examines the identification of a research topic, and discusses the problems associated with making geographical interpretations from historical sources. It then addresses the issues which have to be resolved when writing historical geography. It concludes by affirming both the individual pleasure to be derived from work in historical geography and the mutual benefits to be gained from a dialogue between historical geographers and contemporary human geographers in their common search for historical understanding.
Key concepts: Historical geography, Human geography, Language geography, Relation (database), Time geography, Critical geography, Pleasure, Social science