1981RadiologyRequires access

Evaluation of the inferior vena cava by sonography and venography in children with renal and hepatic tumors.

T L Slovis, A I Philippart, Barbara Cushing, L Das, Alan D. Perlmutter, J O Reed, Harvey I. Wilner, R L Kroovand, Zia Q. Farooki

Open publisher page 50 citations

Abstract

Ultrasonography was used to examine 81 children with intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal malignancies for tumor extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC). In seven of the 18 patients with Wilms tumors and three of the seven patients with hepatic tumors, the IVC ws sonographically abnormal. Venography was also performed in five patients with Wilms tumors. However, percutaneous transfemoral venacavography did not always allow differentiation between extrinsic compression and intracaval tumor. It is suggested that venacavography, when necessary, should be performed via the brachial vein route and that the catheter be advanced into the right atrium. If an injection in this chamber does not result in enough reflux into the retrohepatic IVC for adequate evaluation, the catheter should be advanced into the IVC and a second injection made. However, ultrasonography is the preferred modality for evaluation of the IVC in children because it is the most accurate method and is noninvasive. Real-time ultrasonography makes it possible to distinguish between tumor extension into the lumen of the IVC and extrinsic compression of the vessel.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ultrasonography was used to examine 81 children with intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal malignancies for tumor extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC). In seven of the 18 patients with Wilms tumors and three of the seven patients with hepatic tumors, the IVC ws sonographically abnormal. Venography was also performed in five patients with Wilms tumors. However, percutaneous transfemoral venacavography did not always allow differentiation between extrinsic compression and intracaval tumor. It is suggested that venacavography, when necessary, should be performed via the brachial vein route and that the catheter be advanced into the right atrium. If an injection in this chamber does not result in enough reflux into the retrohepatic IVC for adequate evaluation, the catheter should be advanced into the IVC and a second injection made. However, ultrasonography is the preferred modality for evaluation of the IVC in children because it is the most accurate method and is noninvasive. Real-time ultrasonography makes it possible to distinguish between tumor extension into the lumen of the IVC and extrinsic compression of the vessel.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ultrasonography was used to examine 81 children with intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal malignancies for tumor extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC). In seven of the 18 patients with Wilms tumors and three of the seven patients with hepatic tumors, the IVC ws sonographically abnormal. Venography was also performed in five patients with Wilms tumors. However, percutaneous transfemoral venacavography did not always allow differentiation between extrinsic compression and intracaval tumor. It is suggested that venacavography, when necessary, should be performed via the brachial vein route and that the catheter be advanced into the right atrium. If an injection in this chamber does not result in enough reflux into the retrohepatic IVC for adequate evaluation, the catheter should be advanced into the IVC and a second injection made. However, ultrasonography is the preferred modality for evaluation of the IVC in children because it is the most accurate method and is noninvasive. Real-time ultrasonography makes it possible to distinguish between tumor extension into the lumen of the IVC and extrinsic compression of the vessel.

Key concepts: Medicine, Inferior vena cava, Venography, Radiology, Wilms' tumor, Percutaneous, Catheter, Lumen (anatomy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the inferior vena cava by sonography and venography in children with renal and hepatic tumors. — Research Paper | ScholarLens