2006Microscopy Research and TechniqueRequires access

Comparison of bone formation ingrafted periosteum harvested from tibia and calvaria

Takashi Fujii, Takaaki Ueno, Toshimasa Kagawa, Yoshirou Sakata, Toshio Sugahara

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

Periosteum covers the bone surface and displays the potential to initiate bone formation, after injury to the bone. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the periosteum plays major roles in the healing process after bone fracture. Some reports have described that in the healing of long bone fractures, the periosteum forms new bone by intramembranous and endochondral ossification. Other researchers insist that healing of defects in membrane bone shows bone formation by intramembranous ossification. However, previous studies have not been able to clarify differences in bone formation patterns. We hypothesized that differences in bone formation pattern are associated with the periosteal potential for cell differentiation. The present study grafted periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria, into the suprahyoid muscle, with the aim of interrupting release of factors from bone matrix. Bone formation, after grafting periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria, was examined histologically and radiographically. Grafted tibial periosteum formed a large area of new bone by intramembranous and endochondral ossification, while grafted calvarial periosteum displayed intramembranous ossification. Grafted tibial periosteum formed a larger area of bone than grafted calvarial periosteum. Patterns of cell differentiation thus differ between grafted periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Periosteum covers the bone surface and displays the potential to initiate bone formation, after injury to the bone. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the periosteum plays major roles in the healing process after bone fracture. Some reports have described that in the healing of long bone fractures, the periosteum forms new bone by intramembranous and endochondral ossification. Other researchers insist that healing of defects in membrane bone shows bone formation by intramembranous ossification. However, previous studies have not been able to clarify differences in bone formation patterns. We hypothesized that differences in bone formation pattern are associated with the periosteal potential for cell differentiation. The present study grafted periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria, into the suprahyoid muscle, with the aim of interrupting release of factors from bone matrix. Bone formation, after grafting periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria, was examined histologically and radiographically. Grafted tibial periosteum formed a large area of new bone by intramembranous and endochondral ossification, while grafted calvarial periosteum displayed intramembranous ossification. Grafted tibial periosteum formed a larger area of bone than grafted calvarial periosteum. Patterns of cell differentiation thus differ between grafted periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Periosteum covers the bone surface and displays the potential to initiate bone formation, after injury to the bone. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the periosteum plays major roles in the healing process after bone fracture. Some reports have described that in the healing of long bone fractures, the periosteum forms new bone by intramembranous and endochondral ossification. Other researchers insist that healing of defects in membrane bone shows bone formation by intramembranous ossification. However, previous studies have not been able to clarify differences in bone formation patterns. We hypothesized that differences in bone formation pattern are associated with the periosteal potential for cell differentiation. The present study grafted periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria, into the suprahyoid muscle, with the aim of interrupting release of factors from bone matrix. Bone formation, after grafting periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria, was examined histologically and radiographically. Grafted tibial periosteum formed a large area of new bone by intramembranous and endochondral ossification, while grafted calvarial periosteum displayed intramembranous ossification. Grafted tibial periosteum formed a larger area of bone than grafted calvarial periosteum. Patterns of cell differentiation thus differ between grafted periosteum, harvested from the tibia and calvaria.

Key concepts: Periosteum, Intramembranous ossification, Calvaria, Endochondral ossification, Ossification, Bone healing, Tibia, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of bone formation ingrafted periosteum harvested from tibia and calvaria — Research Paper | ScholarLens