1999•Behavioral and Brain SciencesRequires access
The nontrivial doctrine of cognitive neuroscience
Valerie Gray Hardcastle
Open publisher page 0 citations
Abstract
Gold & Stoljar's “trivial” neuron doctrine is neither a truism in cognitive science nor trivial; it has serious consequences for the future direction of the mind/brain sciences. Not everyone would agree that these consequences are desirable. The authors' “radical” doctrine is not so radical; their division between cognitive neuroscience and neurobiology is largely artificial. Indeed, there is no sharp distinction between cognitive neuroscience and other areas of the brain sciences.