2006Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Upstream Signalized Crossover Intersection: Optimization and Performance Issues

Tarek Sayed, Paul Storer, Godwin Wong

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Left turns have a significant impact on the operation and performance of signalized intersections. Therefore, researchers have investigated alternative measures to improve the performance of intersections with heavy left-turn movements, some of which have been unconventional schemes. One of these schemes is the upstream signalized crossover (USC), a four-legged intersection designed to eliminate left-turn-opposing conflicts by crossing the left and through traffic to the left side of the road at all four approaches prior to the intersection. Crisscrossing action is achieved through the use of a secondary two-phase signal at each crossover point. This research investigated signal optimization strategies for USC intersections and identified important operation issues. The VISSIM microsimulation program was used to model and analyze the unconventional USC intersection and, for comparison, a conventional intersection. The analysis revealed that, for relatively balanced volumes, a USC intersection can significantly reduce average vehicle delays, particularly when the volumes entering the intersection are relatively high. More important, the capacity of the USC intersection was found to be approximately 50% greater than that of a conventional intersection with similar geometry under balanced traffic volumes. For highly unbalanced volumes, particularly when the intersection volumes were relatively low, a conventional intersection outperformed the USC intersection. Overall, the USC intersection showed considerable potential for situations in which one or more of the following conditions exist: (a) intersection volumes are balanced and near or over the capacity of a conventional intersection, (b) traffic volumes are somewhat unbalanced, but the overall entering volumes are too high to be accommodated with a conventional intersection, or (c) the intersection has heavy left-turn volumes that cause excessive delays.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Left turns have a significant impact on the operation and performance of signalized intersections. Therefore, researchers have investigated alternative measures to improve the performance of intersections with heavy left-turn movements, some of which have been unconventional schemes. One of these schemes is the upstream signalized crossover (USC), a four-legged intersection designed to eliminate left-turn-opposing conflicts by crossing the left and through traffic to the left side of the road at all four approaches prior to the intersection. Crisscrossing action is achieved through the use of a secondary two-phase signal at each crossover point. This research investigated signal optimization strategies for USC intersections and identified important operation issues. The VISSIM microsimulation program was used to model and analyze the unconventional USC intersection and, for comparison, a conventional intersection. The analysis revealed that, for relatively balanced volumes, a USC intersection can significantly reduce average vehicle delays, particularly when the volumes entering the intersection are relatively high. More important, the capacity of the USC intersection was found to be approximately 50% greater than that of a conventional intersection with similar geometry under balanced traffic volumes. For highly unbalanced volumes, particularly when the intersection volumes were relatively low, a conventional intersection outperformed the USC intersection. Overall, the USC intersection showed considerable potential for situations in which one or more of the following conditions exist: (a) intersection volumes are balanced and near or over the capacity of a conventional intersection, (b) traffic volumes are somewhat unbalanced, but the overall entering volumes are too high to be accommodated with a conventional intersection, or (c) the intersection has heavy left-turn volumes that cause excessive delays.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Left turns have a significant impact on the operation and performance of signalized intersections. Therefore, researchers have investigated alternative measures to improve the performance of intersections with heavy left-turn movements, some of which have been unconventional schemes. One of these schemes is the upstream signalized crossover (USC), a four-legged intersection designed to eliminate left-turn-opposing conflicts by crossing the left and through traffic to the left side of the road at all four approaches prior to the intersection. Crisscrossing action is achieved through the use of a secondary two-phase signal at each crossover point. This research investigated signal optimization strategies for USC intersections and identified important operation issues. The VISSIM microsimulation program was used to model and analyze the unconventional USC intersection and, for comparison, a conventional intersection. The analysis revealed that, for relatively balanced volumes, a USC intersection can significantly reduce average vehicle delays, particularly when the volumes entering the intersection are relatively high. More important, the capacity of the USC intersection was found to be approximately 50% greater than that of a conventional intersection with similar geometry under balanced traffic volumes. For highly unbalanced volumes, particularly when the intersection volumes were relatively low, a conventional intersection outperformed the USC intersection. Overall, the USC intersection showed considerable potential for situations in which one or more of the following conditions exist: (a) intersection volumes are balanced and near or over the capacity of a conventional intersection, (b) traffic volumes are somewhat unbalanced, but the overall entering volumes are too high to be accommodated with a conventional intersection, or (c) the intersection has heavy left-turn volumes that cause excessive delays.

Key concepts: Intersection (aeronautics), VisSim, Crossover, Microsimulation, Upstream (networking), Point (geometry), Signal timing, Traffic signal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Upstream Signalized Crossover Intersection: Optimization and Performance Issues — Research Paper | ScholarLens