Tidal asymmetry in an estuarine pycnocline: Depth and thickness
Cynthia Cudaback, David A. Jay
Abstract
Open-access reader
Cynthia Cudaback, David A. Jay
Abstract
Open-access reader
Tidal variations in estuarine stratification are revealed by the depth and thickness of the density interface. The depth of the interface may be predicted using an inviscid two‐layer model that combines baroclinic estuarine circulation with barotropic tidal currents [Helfrich, 1995]. Here we present results from a two‐layer model modified to include the effects of bottom friction and interfacial mixing. Modeled layer thickness and speed compare favorably with prior analytic studies [Farmer and Armi, 1986; Pratt, 1986]. We use a bulk Richardson number criterion to estimate the thickness of the pycnocline from two‐layer model results; the predicted pycnocline depth and thickness compare remarkably well with observations. We also investigate the effects of changing bottom friction and barotropic currents on the pycnocline thickness.
OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Tidal variations in estuarine stratification are revealed by the depth and thickness of the density interface. The depth of the interface may be predicted using an inviscid two‐layer model that combines baroclinic estuarine circulation with barotropic tidal currents [Helfrich, 1995]. Here we present results from a two‐layer model modified to include the effects of bottom friction and interfacial mixing. Modeled layer thickness and speed compare favorably with prior analytic studies [Farmer and Armi, 1986; Pratt, 1986]. We use a bulk Richardson number criterion to estimate the thickness of the pycnocline from two‐layer model results; the predicted pycnocline depth and thickness compare remarkably well with observations. We also investigate the effects of changing bottom friction and barotropic currents on the pycnocline thickness.
Key concepts: Pycnocline, Barotropic fluid, Baroclinity, Geology, Stratification (seeds), Inviscid flow, Stratified flow, Estuary