2012•Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative LawRequires access

The Supreme Court and the New Judicial Independence

Lorne Neudorf

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this article, the author argues that the establishment of the Supreme Court imported a new and much broader conception of judicial independence that goes beyond protecting judicial decision-making in individual cases from direct interference by the executive and legislature: the Supreme Court now interacts with the other branches of government as a distinct institution instead of working alongside them as a component of Parliament. It is argued that the new judicial independence demands institutional autonomy and increasingly formal interactions between the judiciary and the other branches. The article then considers the implications of the new judicial independence in terms of the legitimacy of judicial lawmaking by the Supreme Court, offering a comparison with the experience of the apex courts of Canada and the United States.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, the author argues that the establishment of the Supreme Court imported a new and much broader conception of judicial independence that goes beyond protecting judicial decision-making in individual cases from direct interference by the executive and legislature: the Supreme Court now interacts with the other branches of government as a distinct institution instead of working alongside them as a component of Parliament. It is argued that the new judicial independence demands institutional autonomy and increasingly formal interactions between the judiciary and the other branches. The article then considers the implications of the new judicial independence in terms of the legitimacy of judicial lawmaking by the Supreme Court, offering a comparison with the experience of the apex courts of Canada and the United States.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, the author argues that the establishment of the Supreme Court imported a new and much broader conception of judicial independence that goes beyond protecting judicial decision-making in individual cases from direct interference by the executive and legislature: the Supreme Court now interacts with the other branches of government as a distinct institution instead of working alongside them as a component of Parliament. It is argued that the new judicial independence demands institutional autonomy and increasingly formal interactions between the judiciary and the other branches. The article then considers the implications of the new judicial independence in terms of the legitimacy of judicial lawmaking by the Supreme Court, offering a comparison with the experience of the apex courts of Canada and the United States.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Judicial independence, Law, Political science, Judicial activism, Independence (probability theory), Jurisprudence, Judicial review

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Supreme Court and the New Judicial Independence — Research Paper | ScholarLens