The Supreme Court and the New Judicial Independence
Lorne Neudorf
Abstract
Lorne Neudorf
Abstract
In this article, the author argues that the establishment of the Supreme Court imported a new and much broader conception of judicial independence that goes beyond protecting judicial decision-making in individual cases from direct interference by the executive and legislature: the Supreme Court now interacts with the other branches of government as a distinct institution instead of working alongside them as a component of Parliament. It is argued that the new judicial independence demands institutional autonomy and increasingly formal interactions between the judiciary and the other branches. The article then considers the implications of the new judicial independence in terms of the legitimacy of judicial lawmaking by the Supreme Court, offering a comparison with the experience of the apex courts of Canada and the United States.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this article, the author argues that the establishment of the Supreme Court imported a new and much broader conception of judicial independence that goes beyond protecting judicial decision-making in individual cases from direct interference by the executive and legislature: the Supreme Court now interacts with the other branches of government as a distinct institution instead of working alongside them as a component of Parliament. It is argued that the new judicial independence demands institutional autonomy and increasingly formal interactions between the judiciary and the other branches. The article then considers the implications of the new judicial independence in terms of the legitimacy of judicial lawmaking by the Supreme Court, offering a comparison with the experience of the apex courts of Canada and the United States.
Key concepts: Supreme court, Judicial independence, Law, Political science, Judicial activism, Independence (probability theory), Jurisprudence, Judicial review