1976CancerRequires access

Lymphosarcoma. A comparison of extended to conservative chemotherapy

Jerome H. Kaufman, Ediz Z. Ezdinli, C. William Aungst, Leon Stutzman

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Sixty-three patients with Stage III and IV lymphocytic lymphoma were randomized for induction treatment between a single course of nitrogen mustard and a 14-day course of prednisone (conservative therapy) or sequential rotation of BCNU, nitrogen mustard and cytoxan with intermittent vincristine and prednisone for 6 months (extended therapy). Maintenance therapy by an oral alkylating agent (cytoxan or chlorambucil) with or without prednisone was given. Complete remission occurred in 75% of the conservative and 77% of the extended therapy group. The median duration of remission was similar, and greater than 27 months in both groups, and there was no difference in survival. At 1 year 80% of patients with no prior chemotherapy were in remission vs. 47% of patients with prior chemotherapy (p less than .01). No significant advantage for extended chemotherapy was found. The addition of vincristine was not helpful in induction and prednisone during maintenance did not improve the duration of remission or survival.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sixty-three patients with Stage III and IV lymphocytic lymphoma were randomized for induction treatment between a single course of nitrogen mustard and a 14-day course of prednisone (conservative therapy) or sequential rotation of BCNU, nitrogen mustard and cytoxan with intermittent vincristine and prednisone for 6 months (extended therapy). Maintenance therapy by an oral alkylating agent (cytoxan or chlorambucil) with or without prednisone was given. Complete remission occurred in 75% of the conservative and 77% of the extended therapy group. The median duration of remission was similar, and greater than 27 months in both groups, and there was no difference in survival. At 1 year 80% of patients with no prior chemotherapy were in remission vs. 47% of patients with prior chemotherapy (p less than .01). No significant advantage for extended chemotherapy was found. The addition of vincristine was not helpful in induction and prednisone during maintenance did not improve the duration of remission or survival.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sixty-three patients with Stage III and IV lymphocytic lymphoma were randomized for induction treatment between a single course of nitrogen mustard and a 14-day course of prednisone (conservative therapy) or sequential rotation of BCNU, nitrogen mustard and cytoxan with intermittent vincristine and prednisone for 6 months (extended therapy). Maintenance therapy by an oral alkylating agent (cytoxan or chlorambucil) with or without prednisone was given. Complete remission occurred in 75% of the conservative and 77% of the extended therapy group. The median duration of remission was similar, and greater than 27 months in both groups, and there was no difference in survival. At 1 year 80% of patients with no prior chemotherapy were in remission vs. 47% of patients with prior chemotherapy (p less than .01). No significant advantage for extended chemotherapy was found. The addition of vincristine was not helpful in induction and prednisone during maintenance did not improve the duration of remission or survival.

Key concepts: Prednisone, Medicine, Vincristine, Chlorambucil, Nitrogen mustard, Chemotherapy, Induction chemotherapy, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lymphosarcoma. A comparison of extended to conservative chemotherapy — Research Paper | ScholarLens