2012The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismRequires access

Innate Small Babies Are Metabolically Healthy Children

Ivana Milovanović, Falucar Njuieyon, S. Deghmoun, Didier Chevenne, Claire Lévy‐Marchal, Jacques Beltrand

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is regarded as a risk factor for later metabolic complications. The SGA is defined as a birth weight below -2 SD of the distribution for sex and gestational age. However, the definition of SGA does not distinguish between those born after fetal growth restriction and innate SGA (iSGA). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test whether innate SGA infants show any metabolic complications at the age of 2 yr in comparison with infants born appropriate for gestational age (AGA). METHODS: Fifty-eight infants with family SGA risk factors (SGA in a previous pregnancy or among parents, maternal height less than -2 sd for adult height in French women, and small fetal size at second-trimester ultrasound examination) were prospectively followed from midgestation to 2 yr of age. Fetal growth velocity was measured from ultrasound measurements. Body composition and hormonal profile were measured at birth and 1 and 2 yr. RESULTS: Fetal growth velocity was not significantly different between iSGA and AGA (-0.17 ± 0.2 vs. -0.17 ± 0.3 percentiles/d of gestation; P = 0.96). iSGA infants were significantly lighter at birth (-1.7 ± 0.45 vs. 0.46 ± 0.77 SD; P < 0.0001) and at 4 months of age (-0.85 ± 0.88 vs. 0.29 ± 1 SD; P < 0.0001), and they remain so over follow-up (-0.73 ± 1.08 vs. 0.2 ± 1.02 SD; P = 0.0014 at 2 yr). Height z-scores and percent fat time courses followed a similar pattern. No differences in any of the metabolic and hormonal parameters were observed between iSGA and AGA up to 2 yr (insulin at birth, 5.1 ± 6.8 vs. 5.2 ± 4.6 mIU/liter, P = 0.2; at 2 yr, 2 ± 1.6 vs. 2 ± 1.5 mIU/liter, P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Infants born iSGA do not experience severe fetal growth restriction and do not show any evidence of metabolic risk either at birth or in the first 2 yr of life.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is regarded as a risk factor for later metabolic complications. The SGA is defined as a birth weight below -2 SD of the distribution for sex and gestational age. However, the definition of SGA does not distinguish between those born after fetal growth restriction and innate SGA (iSGA). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test whether innate SGA infants show any metabolic complications at the age of 2 yr in comparison with infants born appropriate for gestational age (AGA). METHODS: Fifty-eight infants with family SGA risk factors (SGA in a previous pregnancy or among parents, maternal height less than -2 sd for adult height in French women, and small fetal size at second-trimester ultrasound examination) were prospectively followed from midgestation to 2 yr of age. Fetal growth velocity was measured from ultrasound measurements. Body composition and hormonal profile were measured at birth and 1 and 2 yr. RESULTS: Fetal growth velocity was not significantly different between iSGA and AGA (-0.17 ± 0.2 vs. -0.17 ± 0.3 percentiles/d of gestation; P = 0.96). iSGA infants were significantly lighter at birth (-1.7 ± 0.45 vs. 0.46 ± 0.77 SD; P < 0.0001) and at 4 months of age (-0.85 ± 0.88 vs. 0.29 ± 1 SD; P < 0.0001), and they remain so over follow-up (-0.73 ± 1.08 vs. 0.2 ± 1.02 SD; P = 0.0014 at 2 yr). Height z-scores and percent fat time courses followed a similar pattern. No differences in any of the metabolic and hormonal parameters were observed between iSGA and AGA up to 2 yr (insulin at birth, 5.1 ± 6.8 vs. 5.2 ± 4.6 mIU/liter, P = 0.2; at 2 yr, 2 ± 1.6 vs. 2 ± 1.5 mIU/liter, P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Infants born iSGA do not experience severe fetal growth restriction and do not show any evidence of metabolic risk either at birth or in the first 2 yr of life.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is regarded as a risk factor for later metabolic complications. The SGA is defined as a birth weight below -2 SD of the distribution for sex and gestational age. However, the definition of SGA does not distinguish between those born after fetal growth restriction and innate SGA (iSGA). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test whether innate SGA infants show any metabolic complications at the age of 2 yr in comparison with infants born appropriate for gestational age (AGA). METHODS: Fifty-eight infants with family SGA risk factors (SGA in a previous pregnancy or among parents, maternal height less than -2 sd for adult height in French women, and small fetal size at second-trimester ultrasound examination) were prospectively followed from midgestation to 2 yr of age. Fetal growth velocity was measured from ultrasound measurements. Body composition and hormonal profile were measured at birth and 1 and 2 yr. RESULTS: Fetal growth velocity was not significantly different between iSGA and AGA (-0.17 ± 0.2 vs. -0.17 ± 0.3 percentiles/d of gestation; P = 0.96). iSGA infants were significantly lighter at birth (-1.7 ± 0.45 vs. 0.46 ± 0.77 SD; P < 0.0001) and at 4 months of age (-0.85 ± 0.88 vs. 0.29 ± 1 SD; P < 0.0001), and they remain so over follow-up (-0.73 ± 1.08 vs. 0.2 ± 1.02 SD; P = 0.0014 at 2 yr). Height z-scores and percent fat time courses followed a similar pattern. No differences in any of the metabolic and hormonal parameters were observed between iSGA and AGA up to 2 yr (insulin at birth, 5.1 ± 6.8 vs. 5.2 ± 4.6 mIU/liter, P = 0.2; at 2 yr, 2 ± 1.6 vs. 2 ± 1.5 mIU/liter, P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Infants born iSGA do not experience severe fetal growth restriction and do not show any evidence of metabolic risk either at birth or in the first 2 yr of life.

Key concepts: Small for gestational age, Medicine, Gestational age, Fetus, Birth weight, Gestation, Intrauterine growth restriction, Percentile

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Innate Small Babies Are Metabolically Healthy Children — Research Paper | ScholarLens