Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?
Hon. Richard D. Cudahy
Abstract
Hon. Richard D. Cudahy
Abstract
Retail wheeling is the (new) standard for free competition in one of the few areas the deregulation boom has left untouched. The champions of retail wheeling’s potential efficiency are eager to point out the flaws of burdensome regulation. Yet, these same voices neglect to consider the serious consequences of completely free competition, especially in the context of infrastructure. Supreme Court decisions from another earlier period of heavy deregulation, especially Munn v. Illinois, suggest an apt approach to the regulation of infrastructure in its “affected by public interest” formulation.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Retail wheeling is the (new) standard for free competition in one of the few areas the deregulation boom has left untouched. The champions of retail wheeling’s potential efficiency are eager to point out the flaws of burdensome regulation. Yet, these same voices neglect to consider the serious consequences of completely free competition, especially in the context of infrastructure. Supreme Court decisions from another earlier period of heavy deregulation, especially Munn v. Illinois, suggest an apt approach to the regulation of infrastructure in its “affected by public interest” formulation.
Key concepts: Wheeling, Deregulation, Boom, Context (archaeology), Competition (biology), Supreme court, Neglect, Consumer welfare