1994SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?

Hon. Richard D. Cudahy

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Retail wheeling is the (new) standard for free competition in one of the few areas the deregulation boom has left untouched. The champions of retail wheeling’s potential efficiency are eager to point out the flaws of burdensome regulation. Yet, these same voices neglect to consider the serious consequences of completely free competition, especially in the context of infrastructure. Supreme Court decisions from another earlier period of heavy deregulation, especially Munn v. Illinois, suggest an apt approach to the regulation of infrastructure in its “affected by public interest” formulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Retail wheeling is the (new) standard for free competition in one of the few areas the deregulation boom has left untouched. The champions of retail wheeling’s potential efficiency are eager to point out the flaws of burdensome regulation. Yet, these same voices neglect to consider the serious consequences of completely free competition, especially in the context of infrastructure. Supreme Court decisions from another earlier period of heavy deregulation, especially Munn v. Illinois, suggest an apt approach to the regulation of infrastructure in its “affected by public interest” formulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Retail wheeling is the (new) standard for free competition in one of the few areas the deregulation boom has left untouched. The champions of retail wheeling’s potential efficiency are eager to point out the flaws of burdensome regulation. Yet, these same voices neglect to consider the serious consequences of completely free competition, especially in the context of infrastructure. Supreme Court decisions from another earlier period of heavy deregulation, especially Munn v. Illinois, suggest an apt approach to the regulation of infrastructure in its “affected by public interest” formulation.

Key concepts: Wheeling, Deregulation, Boom, Context (archaeology), Competition (biology), Supreme court, Neglect, Consumer welfare

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary? — Research Paper | ScholarLens