1992•Women s History ReviewOpen access

Lesbian history and gay studies: keeping a feminist perspective

Rosemary Auchmuty, Sheila Jeffreys, Elaine Miller

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

The radical potential of gay studies to challenge the prevailing heterosexist academic vision will only be realised if a lesbian feminist viewpoint is incorporated. At present in gay scholarship the words ‘homosexual’ and ‘gay’ do not always include women, and sexuality is often defined in essentialist terms. Lesbian experience is frequently presented as a ‘pale version of the male’. Gay male history-writing reflects the concerns of the gay male rights movement, which do not challenge patriarchy. Lesbian history, on the other hand, focuses critically on the institutions of patriarchy which serve to keep women in subjection to men. It is argued that lesbians should not be subsumed into the dominant male culture but must seek to transform it through making their voices heard in gay studies as well as in women's studies and in separate lesbian history courses and writings

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The radical potential of gay studies to challenge the prevailing heterosexist academic vision will only be realised if a lesbian feminist viewpoint is incorporated. At present in gay scholarship the words ‘homosexual’ and ‘gay’ do not always include women, and sexuality is often defined in essentialist terms. Lesbian experience is frequently presented as a ‘pale version of the male’. Gay male history-writing reflects the concerns of the gay male rights movement, which do not challenge patriarchy. Lesbian history, on the other hand, focuses critically on the institutions of patriarchy which serve to keep women in subjection to men. It is argued that lesbians should not be subsumed into the dominant male culture but must seek to transform it through making their voices heard in gay studies as well as in women's studies and in separate lesbian history courses and writings

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The radical potential of gay studies to challenge the prevailing heterosexist academic vision will only be realised if a lesbian feminist viewpoint is incorporated. At present in gay scholarship the words ‘homosexual’ and ‘gay’ do not always include women, and sexuality is often defined in essentialist terms. Lesbian experience is frequently presented as a ‘pale version of the male’. Gay male history-writing reflects the concerns of the gay male rights movement, which do not challenge patriarchy. Lesbian history, on the other hand, focuses critically on the institutions of patriarchy which serve to keep women in subjection to men. It is argued that lesbians should not be subsumed into the dominant male culture but must seek to transform it through making their voices heard in gay studies as well as in women's studies and in separate lesbian history courses and writings

Key concepts: Lesbian, Gender studies, Patriarchy, Scholarship, Human sexuality, Essentialism, Sociology, Perspective (graphical)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lesbian history and gay studies: keeping a feminist perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens