1995Journal of Clinical InvestigationOpen access

Clinical implications of the stress response.

George Minowada, William J. Welch

Open full text 280 citations

Abstract

The heat shock response, first observed in Drosophila melano- gaster over thirty years ago, provided investigators a relatively simple way to study rapid changes in gene expression.Simply raising the temperature of Drosophila above its physiologic norm resulted in the decreased expression of those genes which were active before the temperature shock and the increased expression of genes encoding a group of proteins referred to as the heat shock proteins (hsp's).'Over the last 30 years similar changes in gene expression following relevant temperature shocks have been observed in cells from all organisms, be they derived from bacteria, plants, yeast, or mammals.Moreover, the heat shock proteins from various organisms appear highly conserved with respect to their primary structure, mode of regulation, and biochemical function.In addition to heat shock treat- ment, many other types of metabolic insults including exposure to heavy metals, amino acid analogs, different metabolic poisons as well as a variety of relevant insults in vivo (e.g., isch- emia/reperfusion) also elicit increased expression of the hsp's.Accordingly, many investigators now refer to the response more generally as the stress response, and the proteins whose expression increases, the stress proteins.As one might predict, the stress response represents a uni- versally conserved cellular defense program.Perhaps the best example of how the stress response provides for increased cellular protection is illustrated by the phenomenon of "acquired thermotolerance."Cells subjected to a sublethal heat shock treatment, if provided a subsequent recovery period at their normal growth temperature, now are able to survive a second and what would otherwise be a lethal heat shock challenge.Acquired thermotolerance is usually transient, lasting about 24 h in cells grown in culture, and appears dependent upon a number of changes induced by the initial or "priming" heat shock treatment, including the increased expression and accumulation of the stress proteins.Moreover, we now know that any particular agent or treatment which results in an induction of the stress

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The heat shock response, first observed in Drosophila melano- gaster over thirty years ago, provided investigators a relatively simple way to study rapid changes in gene expression.Simply raising the temperature of Drosophila above its physiologic norm resulted in the decreased expression of those genes which were active before the temperature shock and the increased expression of genes encoding a group of proteins referred to as the heat shock proteins (hsp's).'Over the last 30 years similar changes in gene expression following relevant temperature shocks have been observed in cells from all organisms, be they derived from bacteria, plants, yeast, or mammals.Moreover, the heat shock proteins from various organisms appear highly conserved with respect to their primary structure, mode of regulation, and biochemical function.In addition to heat shock treat- ment, many other types of metabolic insults including exposure to heavy metals, amino acid analogs, different metabolic poisons as well as a variety of relevant insults in vivo (e.g., isch- emia/reperfusion) also elicit increased expression of the hsp's.Accordingly, many investigators now refer to the response more generally as the stress response, and the proteins whose expression increases, the stress proteins.As one might predict, the stress response represents a uni- versally conserved cellular defense program.Perhaps the best example of how the stress response provides for increased cellular protection is illustrated by the phenomenon of "acquired thermotolerance."Cells subjected to a sublethal heat shock treatment, if provided a subsequent recovery period at their normal growth temperature, now are able to survive a second and what would otherwise be a lethal heat shock challenge.Acquired thermotolerance is usually transient, lasting about 24 h in cells grown in culture, and appears dependent upon a number of changes induced by the initial or "priming" heat shock treatment, including the increased expression and accumulation of the stress proteins.Moreover, we now know that any particular agent or treatment which results in an induction of the stress

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 280 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The heat shock response, first observed in Drosophila melano- gaster over thirty years ago, provided investigators a relatively simple way to study rapid changes in gene expression.Simply raising the temperature of Drosophila above its physiologic norm resulted in the decreased expression of those genes which were active before the temperature shock and the increased expression of genes encoding a group of proteins referred to as the heat shock proteins (hsp's).'Over the last 30 years similar changes in gene expression following relevant temperature shocks have been observed in cells from all organisms, be they derived from bacteria, plants, yeast, or mammals.Moreover, the heat shock proteins from various organisms appear highly conserved with respect to their primary structure, mode of regulation, and biochemical function.In addition to heat shock treat- ment, many other types of metabolic insults including exposure to heavy metals, amino acid analogs, different metabolic poisons as well as a variety of relevant insults in vivo (e.g., isch- emia/reperfusion) also elicit increased expression of the hsp's.Accordingly, many investigators now refer to the response more generally as the stress response, and the proteins whose expression increases, the stress proteins.As one might predict, the stress response represents a uni- versally conserved cellular defense program.Perhaps the best example of how the stress response provides for increased cellular protection is illustrated by the phenomenon of "acquired thermotolerance."Cells subjected to a sublethal heat shock treatment, if provided a subsequent recovery period at their normal growth temperature, now are able to survive a second and what would otherwise be a lethal heat shock challenge.Acquired thermotolerance is usually transient, lasting about 24 h in cells grown in culture, and appears dependent upon a number of changes induced by the initial or "priming" heat shock treatment, including the increased expression and accumulation of the stress proteins.Moreover, we now know that any particular agent or treatment which results in an induction of the stress

Key concepts: Fight-or-flight response, Function (biology), Computational biology, Biology, Cell function, Gain of function, Neuroscience, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical implications of the stress response. — Research Paper | ScholarLens