Cross-resistance to alkylating agents in multiple myeloma
Joan Bladé, Evarist Feliú, C Rozmán, Jordi Estapé, A. Millà, Emili Montserrat
Abstract
Open-access reader
Joan Bladé, Evarist Feliú, C Rozmán, Jordi Estapé, A. Millà, Emili Montserrat
Abstract
Open-access reader
In order to ascertain whether multiple myeloma patients resistant to one alkylating agent would respond to a second one, high-dose intermittent cyclophosphamide was administered to 12 patients showing resistance to melphalan and prednisone. On the other hand, intermittent melphalan and prednisone treatment was employed in eight myeloma patients resistant to intermittent cyclophosphamide. Only one objective response was achieved among 12 patients on cyclophosphamide therapy, in spite of having employed high doses of this alkylating agent. No responses were achieved with melphalan in the group of cyclophosphamide-resistant patients. The median survival probability was 8.7 months (SD +/- 2.9) for all patients after starting the second alkylating agent. These results suggest cross-resistance between melphalan and cyclophosphamide in myeloma. The authors conclude that a single second alkylating agent cannot be recommended as a treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who are truly refractory to one alkylating agent.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In order to ascertain whether multiple myeloma patients resistant to one alkylating agent would respond to a second one, high-dose intermittent cyclophosphamide was administered to 12 patients showing resistance to melphalan and prednisone. On the other hand, intermittent melphalan and prednisone treatment was employed in eight myeloma patients resistant to intermittent cyclophosphamide. Only one objective response was achieved among 12 patients on cyclophosphamide therapy, in spite of having employed high doses of this alkylating agent. No responses were achieved with melphalan in the group of cyclophosphamide-resistant patients. The median survival probability was 8.7 months (SD +/- 2.9) for all patients after starting the second alkylating agent. These results suggest cross-resistance between melphalan and cyclophosphamide in myeloma. The authors conclude that a single second alkylating agent cannot be recommended as a treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who are truly refractory to one alkylating agent.
Key concepts: Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide, Medicine, Nitrogen mustard, Prednisone, Multiple myeloma, Chemotherapy, Internal medicine