2011Management & Organizational HistoryRequires access

A history of organization studies as a segmented field: Interpretations of the case of Norway

Börre Nylehn

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The field of organization studies is presented, exemplified by the case of Norway, as having developed in the form of seven segments, each representing a quite independent start of activity in the field and developing in separation from the others. Each segment is supported by a set of actors, who represent specific interests and values, including perceptions of what constitutes ‘organization studies’ and what a ‘valuable contribution’ to the field may mean. Contact between the segments has been limited, and there has until recently been difficult to organize conferences within this field of study.The identity of researchers has been that of ‘sociology’,‘political science’, etc., and not ‘organization theory’. It may be misleading to see the field of organization studies as unitary, and it is important to see the contribution by actors outside of Academia, to whom this field is not just an academic discipline, but also a basis for action in various contexts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The field of organization studies is presented, exemplified by the case of Norway, as having developed in the form of seven segments, each representing a quite independent start of activity in the field and developing in separation from the others. Each segment is supported by a set of actors, who represent specific interests and values, including perceptions of what constitutes ‘organization studies’ and what a ‘valuable contribution’ to the field may mean. Contact between the segments has been limited, and there has until recently been difficult to organize conferences within this field of study.The identity of researchers has been that of ‘sociology’,‘political science’, etc., and not ‘organization theory’. It may be misleading to see the field of organization studies as unitary, and it is important to see the contribution by actors outside of Academia, to whom this field is not just an academic discipline, but also a basis for action in various contexts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The field of organization studies is presented, exemplified by the case of Norway, as having developed in the form of seven segments, each representing a quite independent start of activity in the field and developing in separation from the others. Each segment is supported by a set of actors, who represent specific interests and values, including perceptions of what constitutes ‘organization studies’ and what a ‘valuable contribution’ to the field may mean. Contact between the segments has been limited, and there has until recently been difficult to organize conferences within this field of study.The identity of researchers has been that of ‘sociology’,‘political science’, etc., and not ‘organization theory’. It may be misleading to see the field of organization studies as unitary, and it is important to see the contribution by actors outside of Academia, to whom this field is not just an academic discipline, but also a basis for action in various contexts.

Key concepts: Organization studies, Field (mathematics), Sociology, Unitary state, Epistemology, Identity (music), Organizational theory, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A history of organization studies as a segmented field: Interpretations of the case of Norway — Research Paper | ScholarLens