1987World Journal of SurgeryRequires access

The J ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis

B A Taylor, Roger R. Dozois

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

Abstract The experience at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A., with abdominal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileo‐anal anastomosis is now approaching 600 patients. The procedure is safe and, with careful timing and selection of patients, can be performed with minimal mortality. Postoperative morbidity, however, is still considerable, even in the most experienced hands. Increasing experience with the procedure has been shown to be associated with a continuing decline in the incidence of postoperative complications, and a defunctioning ileostomy is still a necessity in the majority of patients. Long‐term functional results of the procedure are satisfactory and have been shown to improve both with the experience of the operator and with the passage of time after surgery. Patient acceptance remains the ultimate sanction, and it appears that the majority of patients are satisfied with their outcome after ileo‐anal anastomosis, with only very few being prepared to consider an alternative. The operation appears to provide a superior quality of life relative to that expected after proctocolectomy and Brooke ileostomy. Not all patients with chronic ulcerative colitis or adenomatosis coli are potential candidates for this procedure, however. The problems of age, obesity, indeterminate colitis and Crohn's disease, co‐existing colorectal neoplasia, technical difficulties at the time of the operation, and the wishes of the patient all must be taken into consideration when assessing the optimal operation in a particular situation. Proctocolectomy with Brooke ileostomy or continent ileostomy and total abdominal colectomy with ileo‐rectal anastomosis both still have roles in the management of diseases such as chronic ulcerative colitis and adenomatosis coli. For a patient who is young, relatively fit, and well motivated and in whom there is little or no doubt about the diagnosis, ileo‐anal anastomosis must be considered as the possible treatment of choice. Increasing experience with the procedure and improvements in functional results seem to be confirming this position.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The experience at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A., with abdominal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileo‐anal anastomosis is now approaching 600 patients. The procedure is safe and, with careful timing and selection of patients, can be performed with minimal mortality. Postoperative morbidity, however, is still considerable, even in the most experienced hands. Increasing experience with the procedure has been shown to be associated with a continuing decline in the incidence of postoperative complications, and a defunctioning ileostomy is still a necessity in the majority of patients. Long‐term functional results of the procedure are satisfactory and have been shown to improve both with the experience of the operator and with the passage of time after surgery. Patient acceptance remains the ultimate sanction, and it appears that the majority of patients are satisfied with their outcome after ileo‐anal anastomosis, with only very few being prepared to consider an alternative. The operation appears to provide a superior quality of life relative to that expected after proctocolectomy and Brooke ileostomy. Not all patients with chronic ulcerative colitis or adenomatosis coli are potential candidates for this procedure, however. The problems of age, obesity, indeterminate colitis and Crohn's disease, co‐existing colorectal neoplasia, technical difficulties at the time of the operation, and the wishes of the patient all must be taken into consideration when assessing the optimal operation in a particular situation. Proctocolectomy with Brooke ileostomy or continent ileostomy and total abdominal colectomy with ileo‐rectal anastomosis both still have roles in the management of diseases such as chronic ulcerative colitis and adenomatosis coli. For a patient who is young, relatively fit, and well motivated and in whom there is little or no doubt about the diagnosis, ileo‐anal anastomosis must be considered as the possible treatment of choice. Increasing experience with the procedure and improvements in functional results seem to be confirming this position.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The experience at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A., with abdominal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileo‐anal anastomosis is now approaching 600 patients. The procedure is safe and, with careful timing and selection of patients, can be performed with minimal mortality. Postoperative morbidity, however, is still considerable, even in the most experienced hands. Increasing experience with the procedure has been shown to be associated with a continuing decline in the incidence of postoperative complications, and a defunctioning ileostomy is still a necessity in the majority of patients. Long‐term functional results of the procedure are satisfactory and have been shown to improve both with the experience of the operator and with the passage of time after surgery. Patient acceptance remains the ultimate sanction, and it appears that the majority of patients are satisfied with their outcome after ileo‐anal anastomosis, with only very few being prepared to consider an alternative. The operation appears to provide a superior quality of life relative to that expected after proctocolectomy and Brooke ileostomy. Not all patients with chronic ulcerative colitis or adenomatosis coli are potential candidates for this procedure, however. The problems of age, obesity, indeterminate colitis and Crohn's disease, co‐existing colorectal neoplasia, technical difficulties at the time of the operation, and the wishes of the patient all must be taken into consideration when assessing the optimal operation in a particular situation. Proctocolectomy with Brooke ileostomy or continent ileostomy and total abdominal colectomy with ileo‐rectal anastomosis both still have roles in the management of diseases such as chronic ulcerative colitis and adenomatosis coli. For a patient who is young, relatively fit, and well motivated and in whom there is little or no doubt about the diagnosis, ileo‐anal anastomosis must be considered as the possible treatment of choice. Increasing experience with the procedure and improvements in functional results seem to be confirming this position.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ileostomy, Proctocolectomy, Abdominal surgery, Ulcerative colitis, Anastomosis, Colectomy, General surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The J ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens