Faculty Choice of a Pension Plan: Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution
Robert L. Clark, M. Melinda Pitts
Abstract
Robert L. Clark, M. Melinda Pitts
Abstract
Worker preferences between defined‐benefit and defined‐contribution pension plans are estimated using a sample of faculty members at North Carolina State University. Newly hired faculty must decide between the state retirement plan (a final pay, defined‐benefit plan) and one of three defined‐contribution plans (TIAA/CREF, VALIC, Lincoln National). This analysis allows the authors to estimate the choice of a pension plan holding constant the place of employment. The study uses both university employment records and a faculty survey to examine the factors that determine the choice of a pension.
OpenAlex reports 70 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Worker preferences between defined‐benefit and defined‐contribution pension plans are estimated using a sample of faculty members at North Carolina State University. Newly hired faculty must decide between the state retirement plan (a final pay, defined‐benefit plan) and one of three defined‐contribution plans (TIAA/CREF, VALIC, Lincoln National). This analysis allows the authors to estimate the choice of a pension plan holding constant the place of employment. The study uses both university employment records and a faculty survey to examine the factors that determine the choice of a pension.
Key concepts: Pension, Plan (archaeology), Pension plan, Actuarial science, Sample (material), State (computer science), Economics, Business