2012European PsychiatryRequires access

W09-02 - Statistical solutions for the evaluation of reliability in-study

Brian Rothman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

One principal characteristic of an outcome measure in a clinical trial is reliability. The reliability of a measurement is an important consideration in the choice of the outcome measure for a clinical trial and in the choice of measures used for eligibility and exclusion. Just as the power of a study is reported in a final publication, so also should the reliability of the outcome and eligibility measurements so as to allow the authors to better describe, and readers to better understand, the sources of imprecision in study results, and to improve the design of future trials. The precision of measurements will be discussed, as the lower the precision, the more subjects will be needed for the clinical trial, which can affect outcomes and increase cost. The speaker will address the main components of measurement error, including systematic bias (general learning or fatigue effects), and random error due to biological or mechanical variation (including administration of study efficacy measures). In a clinical trial, error components should be meaningfully quantified for the researcher and physician to relate the described error to judgments regarding analytical goals (rather than just the statistical significance of the reliability indicators). Researchers should be cautious in (1) concluding acceptable reliability even if a correlation is high; (2) extrapolating the results of to a new sample; and (3) comparing reliability results between studies. From this workshop, clinicians and statisticians in industry and academia will learn: Understanding reliability to assess how precise are measurements. To identify graphical, numerical methods to a range of models encountered in clinical trials.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One principal characteristic of an outcome measure in a clinical trial is reliability. The reliability of a measurement is an important consideration in the choice of the outcome measure for a clinical trial and in the choice of measures used for eligibility and exclusion. Just as the power of a study is reported in a final publication, so also should the reliability of the outcome and eligibility measurements so as to allow the authors to better describe, and readers to better understand, the sources of imprecision in study results, and to improve the design of future trials. The precision of measurements will be discussed, as the lower the precision, the more subjects will be needed for the clinical trial, which can affect outcomes and increase cost. The speaker will address the main components of measurement error, including systematic bias (general learning or fatigue effects), and random error due to biological or mechanical variation (including administration of study efficacy measures). In a clinical trial, error components should be meaningfully quantified for the researcher and physician to relate the described error to judgments regarding analytical goals (rather than just the statistical significance of the reliability indicators). Researchers should be cautious in (1) concluding acceptable reliability even if a correlation is high; (2) extrapolating the results of to a new sample; and (3) comparing reliability results between studies. From this workshop, clinicians and statisticians in industry and academia will learn: Understanding reliability to assess how precise are measurements. To identify graphical, numerical methods to a range of models encountered in clinical trials.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One principal characteristic of an outcome measure in a clinical trial is reliability. The reliability of a measurement is an important consideration in the choice of the outcome measure for a clinical trial and in the choice of measures used for eligibility and exclusion. Just as the power of a study is reported in a final publication, so also should the reliability of the outcome and eligibility measurements so as to allow the authors to better describe, and readers to better understand, the sources of imprecision in study results, and to improve the design of future trials. The precision of measurements will be discussed, as the lower the precision, the more subjects will be needed for the clinical trial, which can affect outcomes and increase cost. The speaker will address the main components of measurement error, including systematic bias (general learning or fatigue effects), and random error due to biological or mechanical variation (including administration of study efficacy measures). In a clinical trial, error components should be meaningfully quantified for the researcher and physician to relate the described error to judgments regarding analytical goals (rather than just the statistical significance of the reliability indicators). Researchers should be cautious in (1) concluding acceptable reliability even if a correlation is high; (2) extrapolating the results of to a new sample; and (3) comparing reliability results between studies. From this workshop, clinicians and statisticians in industry and academia will learn: Understanding reliability to assess how precise are measurements. To identify graphical, numerical methods to a range of models encountered in clinical trials.

Key concepts: Reliability (semiconductor), Sample size determination, Statistical power, Outcome (game theory), Computer science, Range (aeronautics), Clinical trial, Reliability engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
W09-02 - Statistical solutions for the evaluation of reliability in-study — Research Paper | ScholarLens